Jens Foerderer
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Marketing top 5%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 10%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Topics
- Digital Platforms and Economics (15 papers)Business Strategy and Innovation (7 papers)Digital Marketing and Social Media (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Jens Foerderer
19 papers receiving 402 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Strategy and Management 269
- Sociology and Political Science 147
- Marketing 126
- Management Science and Operations Research 55
- Information Systems 54
Countries citing papers authored by Jens Foerderer
This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Foerderer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Foerderer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Foerderer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Foerderer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Foerderer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Foerderer. The network helps show where Jens Foerderer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Foerderer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Foerderer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Foerderer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Foerderer. Jens Foerderer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 37 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | Platform Governance Mechanisms: An Integrated Literature Review and Research Directions | 10 |
| 10 | Wolf in a Sheep's Clothing: When do Complementors Face Competition with Platform Owners? | 1 |
| 11 | 60 | |
| 12 | App Superstars: Are High-Status Complementors a Sustained Source of Innovation in Platform Ecosystems? | 1 |
| 13 | Regulation of Digital Platform Ecosystems: Evidence from Russia's Google vs Yandex Ruling. | 0 |
| 14 | 76 | |
| 15 | 144 | |
| 16 | Do Online Communities Benefit from Appointing Volunteer Moderators? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design | 1 |
| 17 | Relational Third-Party Governance: Evidence From Apple’s World Wide Developer Conference | 2 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Does Platform Owner's Entry Crowd Out Innovation? Evidence from Google Photos | 0 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Jens Foerderer
Jens Foerderer is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Marketing and Computer Science Applications, having authored 23 papers that have together received 412 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Platforms and Economics (15 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (7 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (269 citations), Marketing (126 citations) and Computer Science Applications (52 citations). Jens Foerderer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Armin Heinzl, Thomas Kude, Sunil Mithas, Sebastian Schuetz, Brad N. Greenwood and Yan Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Management Science, MIS Quarterly and Journal of Operations Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.