Jens Andermann
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Museology top 2%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Silke Arnold‐de SimineWilliam L. RoweIan R. MackenzieBarry TaylorAndrew DowlingDavid GeorgeDavid Carey
- Topics
- Latin American Literature Studies (5 papers)Cinema History and Criticism (5 papers)Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaTheory Culture & SocietyJournal of Material Culture
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jens Andermann
35 papers receiving 230 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Sociology and Political Science 119
- Social Psychology 70
- Cultural Studies 68
- Museology 54
- Anthropology 46
Countries citing papers authored by Jens Andermann
This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Andermann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Andermann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Andermann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Andermann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Andermann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Andermann. The network helps show where Jens Andermann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Andermann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Andermann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Andermann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Andermann. Jens Andermann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | The Projected Nation: Argentine Cinema and the Social Margins | 1 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | Productions of space/places of construction: landscape and architecture in contemporary Latín American film | 1 |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | Paisaje: Imagen, entorno, ensamble | 11 |
| 15 | La imagen limítrofe: naturaleza, economía y política en dos filmes de Lisandro Alonso | 0 |
| 16 | The Optic of the State: Visuality and Power in Argentina and Brazil | 40 |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | Mapas de poder : una arqueología literaria del espacio argentino | 10 |
| 20 | 0 |
About Jens Andermann
Jens Andermann is a scholar working on Museology, Cultural Studies and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 43 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Latin American Literature Studies (5 papers), Cinema History and Criticism (5 papers) and Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Museology (54 citations), Cultural Studies (68 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (43 citations). Jens Andermann has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Silke Arnold‐de Simine, William L. Rowe, Ian R. Mackenzie, Barry Taylor, Andrew Dowling, David George and David Carey. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Theory Culture & Society and Journal of Material Culture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.