Jennifer Isautier
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Health top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kirsten McCafferyBrooke NickelErin CvejicJulie AyreTessa CoppCarissa BonnerRachael H DoddSamuel Cornell
- Topics
- Misinformation and Its Impacts (5 papers)Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (5 papers)Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jennifer Isautier
22 papers receiving 692 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- General Health Professions 224
- Health 212
- Sociology and Political Science 209
- Clinical Psychology 186
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 154
Countries citing papers authored by Jennifer Isautier
This map shows the geographic impact of Jennifer Isautier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jennifer Isautier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jennifer Isautier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jennifer Isautier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jennifer Isautier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jennifer Isautier. The network helps show where Jennifer Isautier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jennifer Isautier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jennifer Isautier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jennifer Isautier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jennifer Isautier. Jennifer Isautier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 36 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 125 | |
| 18 | 157 | |
| 19 | 187 | |
| 20 | 51 |
About Jennifer Isautier
Jennifer Isautier is a scholar working on Health, Family Practice and General Health Professions, having authored 24 papers that have together received 702 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Misinformation and Its Impacts (5 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (5 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (212 citations), Modeling and Simulation (56 citations) and Clinical Psychology (186 citations). Jennifer Isautier has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kirsten McCaffery, Brooke Nickel, Erin Cvejic, Julie Ayre, Tessa Copp, Carissa Bonner, Rachael H Dodd, Samuel Cornell, Kristen Pickles and Thomas Dakin. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.