Nick Ormiston‐Smith

1.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
13 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Nick Ormiston‐Smith is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Nick Ormiston‐Smith has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Oncology, 5 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 2 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Nick Ormiston‐Smith's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (8 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (5 papers) and Cancer Risks and Factors (2 papers). Nick Ormiston‐Smith is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (8 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (5 papers) and Cancer Risks and Factors (2 papers). Nick Ormiston‐Smith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Nick Ormiston‐Smith's co-authors include Peter Sasieni, Amar Ahmad, L Ironmonger, Jon Shelton, R. Steele, Alan White, Amanda Seims, C S Thomson, Alison Cox and Lucy Elliss‐Brookes and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ, British Journal of Cancer and Thorax.

In The Last Decade

Nick Ormiston‐Smith

10 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The fraction of cancer attributable to modifiable risk factors in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the United Kingdom in 2015

2018 357 citations Katrina Brown, Harriet Rumgay et al. British Journal of Cancer profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nick Ormiston‐Smith United Kingdom	8	567	169	160	126	118	13	1.1k
Jon Shelton United Kingdom	11	865 1.5×	193 1.1×	220 1.4×	175 1.4×	146 1.2×	25	1.4k
Manuela Quaresma United Kingdom	14	656 1.2×	164 1.0×	128 0.8×	134 1.1×	117 1.0×	29	1.1k
Louise F. Wilson Australia	22	422 0.7×	87 0.5×	246 1.5×	180 1.4×	99 0.8×	53	1.2k
Raghib Ali United Arab Emirates	21	366 0.6×	93 0.6×	207 1.3×	123 1.0×	90 0.8×	70	1.2k
Tadeusz Dyba Finland	17	663 1.2×	147 0.9×	193 1.2×	197 1.6×	135 1.1×	41	1.3k
Dean H. Gesme United States	16	727 1.3×	308 1.8×	224 1.4×	109 0.9×	88 0.7×	33	1.4k
Dinorah Martinez‐Tyson United States	11	443 0.8×	214 1.3×	114 0.7×	109 0.9×	97 0.8×	19	997
Fiona McKenzie France	18	584 1.0×	110 0.7×	109 0.7×	238 1.9×	82 0.7×	31	1.0k
Steven Oliver United Kingdom	19	396 0.7×	318 1.9×	254 1.6×	102 0.8×	98 0.8×	33	1.0k
Paul Carter United Kingdom	22	473 0.8×	187 1.1×	163 1.0×	197 1.6×	164 1.4×	35	1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Ormiston‐Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Ormiston‐Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Ormiston‐Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Ormiston‐Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Ormiston‐Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Ormiston‐Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Ormiston‐Smith. The network helps show where Nick Ormiston‐Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nick Ormiston‐Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nick Ormiston‐Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nick Ormiston‐Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nick Ormiston‐Smith. Nick Ormiston‐Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

Nickel, Brooke, Nick Ormiston‐Smith, Erin Cvejic, et al.. (2025). Impact of population based breast density notification: multisite parallel arm randomised controlled trial in BreastScreen. BMJ. 391. e083649–e083649.

Li, Tong, et al.. (2024). Factors associated with private or public breast cancer screening attendance in Queensland, Australia: A retrospective cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical Screening. 31(4). 258–262.

Nickel, Brooke, Nick Ormiston‐Smith, Erin Cvejic, et al.. (2023). Psychosocial outcomes and health service use after notifying women participating in population breast screening when they have dense breasts: a BreastScreen Queensland randomised controlled trial. The Medical Journal of Australia. 219(9). 423–428. 3 indexed citations

Brown, Katrina, Harriet Rumgay, Alison Cox, et al.. (2018). The fraction of cancer attributable to modifiable risk factors in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the United Kingdom in 2015. British Journal of Cancer. 118(8). 1130–1141. 357 indexed citations breakdown →

White, Alan, et al.. (2018). A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK. BMC Cancer. 18(1). 906–906. 242 indexed citations

Carneiro, Isabella Gomes, et al.. (2017). Linking the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey to Cancer registration: relating patient experience to outcomes, a step towards better services and outcomes. International Journal for Population Data Science. 1(1). 1 indexed citations

Rutherford, Mark J., L Ironmonger, Nick Ormiston‐Smith, et al.. (2015). Estimating the potential survival gains by eliminating socioeconomic and sex inequalities in stage at diagnosis of melanoma. British Journal of Cancer. 112(S1). S116–S123. 20 indexed citations

White, Becky L., et al.. (2015). Piloting the Impact of Three Interventions on Guaiac Faecal Occult Blood Test Uptake within the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. BioMed Research International. 2015. 1–11. 18 indexed citations

Ahmad, Amar, Nick Ormiston‐Smith, & Peter Sasieni. (2015). Trends in the lifetime risk of developing cancer in Great Britain: comparison of risk for those born from 1930 to 1960. British Journal of Cancer. 112(5). 943–947. 195 indexed citations

10.

Ironmonger, L, et al.. (2015). 43: The impact of a national public awareness campaign for cough as a lung cancer symptom. Lung Cancer. 87. S17–S17.

11.

Ironmonger, L, et al.. (2014). An evaluation of the impact of large-scale interventions to raise public awareness of a lung cancer symptom. British Journal of Cancer. 112(1). 207–216. 94 indexed citations

12.

Hopkinson, Nicholas S, Adam Lester‐George, Nick Ormiston‐Smith, Alison Cox, & Deborah Arnott. (2013). Child uptake of smoking by area across the UK. Thorax. 69(9). 873–875. 27 indexed citations

13.

Sasieni, Peter, Jon Shelton, Nick Ormiston‐Smith, C S Thomson, & P Silcocks. (2011). What is the lifetime risk of developing cancer?: the effect of adjusting for multiple primaries. British Journal of Cancer. 105(3). 460–465. 113 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact