Jenna A. LoGiudice
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Co-authors
- Cheryl Tatano BeckRobert K. GableEileen R. O’SheaKathryn E. PhillipsDiana R. MagerCynthia BautistaAlison E. KrisLaura Conklin
- Topics
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (8 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers)Intimate Partner and Family Violence (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jenna A. LoGiudice
17 papers receiving 382 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Clinical Psychology 246
- General Health Professions 131
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 95
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 90
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 63
Countries citing papers authored by Jenna A. LoGiudice
This map shows the geographic impact of Jenna A. LoGiudice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jenna A. LoGiudice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jenna A. LoGiudice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jenna A. LoGiudice
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jenna A. LoGiudice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jenna A. LoGiudice. The network helps show where Jenna A. LoGiudice may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jenna A. LoGiudice
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jenna A. LoGiudice. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jenna A. LoGiudice based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jenna A. LoGiudice. Jenna A. LoGiudice is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 105 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | Population Health for Nurses: Improving Community Outcomes | 2 |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 119 | |
| 19 | 28 | |
| 20 | “It was the Best of Times, It was the Worst of times:” The Lived Experience of Childbearing from Survivors of Sexual Abuse | 4 |
About Jenna A. LoGiudice
Jenna A. LoGiudice is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (8 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (12 citations), Clinical Psychology (246 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (90 citations). Jenna A. LoGiudice has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Cheryl Tatano Beck, Robert K. Gable, Eileen R. O’Shea, Kathryn E. Phillips, Diana R. Mager, Cynthia Bautista, Alison E. Kris and Laura Conklin. Their work appears in journals such as Midwifery, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing and Journal of Nursing Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.