Jenice Prather‐Kinsey

563 total citations
18 papers, 419 citations indexed

About

Jenice Prather‐Kinsey is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Jenice Prather‐Kinsey has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 419 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Accounting, 10 papers in Strategy and Management and 4 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Jenice Prather‐Kinsey's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (18 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (9 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers). Jenice Prather‐Kinsey is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (18 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (9 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers). Jenice Prather‐Kinsey collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Indonesia. Jenice Prather‐Kinsey's co-authors include Eva K. Jermakowicz, Gary K. Meek, Francesco De Luca, Ed O’Donnell, Paul Tanyi, Sandra Waller Shelton, Myungsun Kim and Scott L. Boyar and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Accounting Organizations and Society and Journal of Accounting and Public Policy.

In The Last Decade

Jenice Prather‐Kinsey

16 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jenice Prather‐Kinsey United States 11 379 216 112 52 17 18 419
Caren Schelleman Netherlands 10 461 1.2× 163 0.8× 74 0.7× 61 1.2× 34 2.0× 17 496
Huichi Huang United States 7 514 1.4× 192 0.9× 83 0.7× 62 1.2× 49 2.9× 9 552
José A. Laínez Spain 6 358 0.9× 244 1.1× 65 0.6× 43 0.8× 29 1.7× 7 401
Marsha B. Keune United States 8 351 0.9× 114 0.5× 72 0.6× 65 1.3× 32 1.9× 12 380
Kay W. Tatum United States 6 389 1.0× 117 0.5× 71 0.6× 67 1.3× 28 1.6× 7 418
Oscar J. Holzmann United States 7 217 0.6× 136 0.6× 83 0.7× 56 1.1× 41 2.4× 51 299
Scott N. Bronson United States 6 456 1.2× 192 0.9× 65 0.6× 104 2.0× 25 1.5× 7 479
Jeffrey R. Casterella United States 9 557 1.5× 193 0.9× 70 0.6× 102 2.0× 50 2.9× 17 591
Songlan Peng Canada 9 416 1.1× 164 0.8× 116 1.0× 73 1.4× 23 1.4× 16 461
Zvi Singer Canada 11 434 1.1× 217 1.0× 51 0.5× 109 2.1× 32 1.9× 27 463

Countries citing papers authored by Jenice Prather‐Kinsey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jenice Prather‐Kinsey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jenice Prather‐Kinsey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jenice Prather‐Kinsey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jenice Prather‐Kinsey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jenice Prather‐Kinsey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jenice Prather‐Kinsey. The network helps show where Jenice Prather‐Kinsey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jenice Prather‐Kinsey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jenice Prather‐Kinsey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jenice Prather‐Kinsey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jenice Prather‐Kinsey. Jenice Prather‐Kinsey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Luca, Francesco De, et al.. (2024). Cross-border listed firms’ IFRS-based financial reports: Are they comparable?. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 45. 107207–107207. 1 indexed citations
2.
Prather‐Kinsey, Jenice, et al.. (2022). Improving the global comparability of IFRS-based financial reporting through global enforcement: a proposed organizational dynamic. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance. 19(3). 330–351. 16 indexed citations
3.
Prather‐Kinsey, Jenice, et al.. (2018). Implications for IFRS principles-based and US GAAP rules-based applications: Are accountants’ decisions affected by work location and core self-evaluations?. Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation. 32. 61–69. 12 indexed citations
4.
Luca, Francesco De & Jenice Prather‐Kinsey. (2018). Legitimacy theory may explain the failure of global adoption of IFRS: the case of Europe and the U.S.. Journal of Management & Governance. 22(3). 501–534. 18 indexed citations
5.
Luca, Francesco De, et al.. (2015). The Impact of the Financial Crisis on Earnings Management: Empirical Evidence from the Top 5,000 Non-Listed Stock Italian Companies. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4 indexed citations
6.
Prather‐Kinsey, Jenice & Paul Tanyi. (2014). The Market Reaction to SEC IFRS-Related Announcements: The Case of American Depository Receipt (ADR) Firms in the U.S.. Accounting Horizons. 28(3). 579–603. 14 indexed citations
7.
Prather‐Kinsey, Jenice & Paul Tanyi. (2014). The Market Reaction to SEC IFRS-Related Announcements: The Case of American Depository Receipt (ADR) Firms in the U.S.. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
8.
O’Donnell, Ed & Jenice Prather‐Kinsey. (2010). Nationality and differences in auditor risk assessment: A research note with experimental evidence. Accounting Organizations and Society. 35(5). 558–564. 24 indexed citations
9.
Prather‐Kinsey, Jenice. (2010). Discussion of “IFRS adoption in Europe and investment-cash flow sensitivity: Outsider versus insider economies”. The International Journal of Accounting. 45(2). 169–172. 4 indexed citations
10.
Kim, Myungsun & Jenice Prather‐Kinsey. (2010). An Additional Source of Financial Analysts' Earnings Forecast Errors: Imperfect Adjustments for Cost Behavior. Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance. 25(1). 27–51. 9 indexed citations
11.
Jermakowicz, Eva K., et al.. (2007). The Value Relevance of Accounting Income Reported by DAX‐30 German Companies. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting. 18(3). 151–191. 120 indexed citations
12.
Prather‐Kinsey, Jenice. (2006). Developing countries converging with developed-country accounting standards: Evidence from South Africa and Mexico. The International Journal of Accounting. 41(2). 141–162. 65 indexed citations
13.
Prather‐Kinsey, Jenice & Sandra Waller Shelton. (2005). IAS Versus U.S. GAAP: Assessing the Quality of Financial Reporting in South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States. 18. 153–168. 10 indexed citations
14.
Prather‐Kinsey, Jenice & Gary K. Meek. (2004). The Effect of Revised IAS 14 on Segment Reporting by IAS Companies. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
15.
Prather‐Kinsey, Jenice, et al.. (2004). An Analysis of International Accounting Research in U.S.- and Non-U.S.-Based Academic Accounting Journals. Journal of International Accounting Research. 3(1). 63–81. 29 indexed citations
16.
Prather‐Kinsey, Jenice & Gary K. Meek. (2004). The effect of revised IAS 14 on segment reporting by IAS companies. European Accounting Review. 13(2). 213–234. 50 indexed citations
17.
Prather‐Kinsey, Jenice, et al.. (1999). An analysis of the authorship of international accounting research in U.S. journals and AOS: 1980 through 1996. The International Journal of Accounting. 34(2). 261–282. 17 indexed citations
18.
Prather‐Kinsey, Jenice, et al.. (1998). An Analysis of International Accounting Research in U.S. Academic Accounting Journals, 1980 Through 1993. SSRN Electronic Journal. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Caren Schelleman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Huichi Huang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by José A. Laínez Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marsha B. Keune Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kay W. Tatum Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Oscar J. Holzmann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Scott N. Bronson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jeffrey R. Casterella Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Songlan Peng Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Zvi Singer
Rankless by CCL
2026