Jeffrey DeVido

840 citations
15 papers · 621 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jeffrey DeVido

14 papers receiving 605 citations

Peers

Jeffrey DeVido
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 257
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 184
  • Clinical Psychology 82
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 50
  • Immunology 63
Replace N. Zhao with:
N. Zhao China
Isha Dhingra United States
Jeff Dang United States
Josiane Bourque Canada
Maria Giuseppina Petruzzelli Italy
James Stevenson United States
Shu Takagai Japan
Antonia Marsden United Kingdom
Volkan Topçuoğlu Türkiye
C. J. Meijer Netherlands
Jeffrey DeVido relative to N. Zhao China N. Zhao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
N. Zhao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jeffrey DeVido

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeffrey DeVido's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeffrey DeVido with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeffrey DeVido more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeffrey DeVido

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeffrey DeVido. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeffrey DeVido. The network helps show where Jeffrey DeVido may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jeffrey DeVido, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jeffrey DeVido Line = papers co-authored together Jeffrey DeVido links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2012140
2 2008132
3 200362
4 201054
5 201551
6 201245
7 201537
8 200932
9 201528
10 200821
11 201511
12 20144
13 20143
14 20201
15 20250

About Jeffrey DeVido

Jeffrey DeVido is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Epidemiology, General Health Professions and Immunology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 621 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (3 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Hallucinations in medical conditions (1 paper), DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (1 paper), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper) and Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (257 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (184 citations), Clinical Psychology (82 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (50 citations) and Immunology (63 citations). Jeffrey DeVido has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Roger D. Weiss, Marilla Geraci, Karina S. Blair, James Blair, Daniel S. Pine, Nick G. Hollon, Marcela C. Otero, Bruce W. Smith, Olivera Bogunovic and Daniel McCaffrey. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal on Addictions, Harvard Review of Psychiatry, Current Psychiatry Reports, American Journal of Psychiatry and Telemedicine Journal and e-Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact