Jeff L. McMullin
- Accounting top 2%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Finance top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Co-authors
- Bryce SchonbergerJoshua MadsenRichard A. CazierBrian P. MillerBrady J. TwedtMark L. DeFondYaniv KonchitchkiPaul S. Adler
- Topics
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (12 papers)Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (8 papers)Corporate Finance and Governance (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Jeff L. McMullin
15 papers receiving 803 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Accounting 646
- Strategy and Management 252
- Finance 231
- Economics and Econometrics 222
- Management Information Systems 93
Countries citing papers authored by Jeff L. McMullin
This map shows the geographic impact of Jeff L. McMullin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeff L. McMullin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeff L. McMullin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jeff L. McMullin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeff L. McMullin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeff L. McMullin. The network helps show where Jeff L. McMullin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jeff L. McMullin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jeff L. McMullin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jeff L. McMullin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jeff L. McMullin. Jeff L. McMullin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | When Good Balance Goes Bad: A Discussion of Common Pitfalls When Using Entropy Balancingbreakdown → | 84 |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 41 | |
| 5 | Entropy-balanced accrualsbreakdown → | 448 |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 74 | |
| 8 | 57 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | The Role of Firm Status in Appointments of Accounting Financial Experts to Audit Committees | 10 |
| 15 | Does Superior Knowledge Management Increase Shareholder Value | 3 |
About Jeff L. McMullin
Jeff L. McMullin is a scholar working on Accounting, General Decision Sciences and Finance, having authored 15 papers that have together received 823 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (12 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (8 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (646 citations), Finance (231 citations) and Strategy and Management (252 citations). Jeff L. McMullin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Bryce Schonberger, Joshua Madsen, Richard A. Cazier, Brian P. Miller, Brady J. Twedt, Mark L. DeFond, Yaniv Konchitchki, Paul S. Adler, Peer C. Fiss and Mark S. Young. Their work appears in journals such as The Accounting Review, Decision Support Systems and Review of Accounting Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.