Jean‐Pierre Mothet
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Biochemistry top 0.02%
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Physiology top 2%
- Biological Psychiatry top 0.2%
- Co-authors
- Loredano PollegioniStéphane H. R. OlietMagalie MartineauHerman WoloskerChristopher D. FerrisRoscoe O. BradySolomon H. SnyderGérard Baux
- Topics
- Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (38 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (34 papers)Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceItalyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jean‐Pierre Mothet
51 papers receiving 5.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 3.3k
- Biochemistry 3.0k
- Molecular Biology 2.6k
- Physiology 842
- Biological Psychiatry 817
Countries citing papers authored by Jean‐Pierre Mothet
This map shows the geographic impact of Jean‐Pierre Mothet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean‐Pierre Mothet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean‐Pierre Mothet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jean‐Pierre Mothet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean‐Pierre Mothet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean‐Pierre Mothet. The network helps show where Jean‐Pierre Mothet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jean‐Pierre Mothet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jean‐Pierre Mothet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jean‐Pierre Mothet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jean‐Pierre Mothet. Jean‐Pierre Mothet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | 56 | |
| 8 | 123 | |
| 9 | 43 | |
| 10 | 72 | |
| 11 | 152 | |
| 12 | 76 | |
| 13 | 127 | |
| 14 | 35 | |
| 15 | 139 | |
| 16 | 120 | |
| 17 | 54 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 80 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Jean‐Pierre Mothet
Jean‐Pierre Mothet is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 51 papers that have together received 5.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (38 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (34 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (3.0k citations), Biological Psychiatry (817 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (3.3k citations). Jean‐Pierre Mothet has collaborated with scholars based in France, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Loredano Pollegioni, Stéphane H. R. Oliet, Magalie Martineau, Herman Wolosker, Christopher D. Ferris, Roscoe O. Brady, Solomon H. Snyder, Gérard Baux, Angèle Parent and David J. Linden. Their work appears in journals such as Cell, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.