Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Chemotherapy with Preoperative Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer
20062.0k citationsJean-François Bosset, Laurence Collette et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery Compared with Surgery Alone in Squamous-Cell Cancer of the Esophagus
19971.0k citationsJean-François Bosset, M Gignoux et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: long-term results of the EORTC 22921 randomised study
2014505 citationsJean-François Bosset, G. Calais et al.The Lancet Oncologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Jean-Claude Ollier
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jean-Claude Ollier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean-Claude Ollier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean-Claude Ollier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jean-Claude Ollier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean-Claude Ollier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean-Claude Ollier. The network helps show where Jean-Claude Ollier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jean-Claude Ollier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jean-Claude Ollier.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jean-Claude Ollier based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jean-Claude Ollier. Jean-Claude Ollier is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Bosset, Jean-François, G. Calais, Laurent Mineur, et al.. (2014). Fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: long-term results of the EORTC 22921 randomised study. The Lancet Oncology. 15(2). 184–190.505 indexed citations breakdown →
Denis, Bernard & Jean-Claude Ollier. (2008). Occlusion intestinale et cancer abdomino-pelvien évolué. Gastroentérologie Clinique et Biologique. 26(4). 424–433.1 indexed citations
4.
Bosset, Jean-François, Laurence Collette, G. Calais, et al.. (2006). Chemotherapy with Preoperative Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 355(11). 1114–1123.2002 indexed citations breakdown →
Denis, Bernard & Jean-Claude Ollier. (2002). [Management of bowel obstruction in advanced abdominal or pelvic cancer].. PubMed. 26(4). 372–85.5 indexed citations
9.
Bosset, Jean-François, M Gignoux, Jean–Pierre Triboulet, et al.. (1997). Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery Compared with Surgery Alone in Squamous-Cell Cancer of the Esophagus. New England Journal of Medicine. 337(3). 161–167.1025 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.