Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Comparison of Two Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Regimens for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Results of the Phase III Trial ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2
This map shows the geographic impact of Bernard Denis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bernard Denis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bernard Denis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bernard Denis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bernard Denis. The network helps show where Bernard Denis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bernard Denis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bernard Denis.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bernard Denis based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bernard Denis. Bernard Denis is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Broc, Guillaume, Bernard Denis, Kamel Gana, et al.. (2015). Comparative Effectiveness of an Informed Choice and Fear Appeal on Colorectal Cancer Screening Program Invitation. A Randomized Controlled Trial. International Review of Social Psychology. 28(3). 59–96.3 indexed citations
7.
Guintard, Claude & Bernard Denis. (2013). Notion de rusticité chez le bovins: cas particulier de l'Aurochs-reconstitué. 19–29.1 indexed citations
Denis, Bernard. (2008). Léspèce caprine est restée historiquement en marge du mouvment de création de races. 13–16.1 indexed citations
10.
Denis, Bernard. (2004). Quelques notes sur l'alimentation traditionnelle du lapin. 159(75). 63–68.1 indexed citations
11.
Denis, Bernard, et al.. (2002). Consentement éclairé en endoscopie digestive : Enquête d'opinion auprès des malades.. Gastroentérologie Clinique et Biologique.1 indexed citations
12.
Denis, Bernard, et al.. (1994). Les grands traités de zootechnie et leur conception de cette discipline. 3–24.1 indexed citations
13.
Denis, Bernard, et al.. (1992). [Anal and perianal lesions in symptomatic HIV infections. Prospective study of a series of 190 patients].. PubMed. 16(2). 148–54.17 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.