Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations
19941.6k citationsAlexandre Roussel, P Ségol et al.profile →
Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery Compared with Surgery Alone in Squamous-Cell Cancer of the Esophagus
19971.0k citationsM Gignoux, Emmanuel Tiret et al.profile →
Preoperative Radiotherapy as Adjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer
This map shows the geographic impact of M Gignoux's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M Gignoux with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M Gignoux more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M Gignoux. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M Gignoux. The network helps show where M Gignoux may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M Gignoux
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M Gignoux.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M Gignoux based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M Gignoux. M Gignoux is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Launoy, Guy, Catherine A. Herbert, Jean-Pierre Vallée, et al.. (1996). [Mass screening for colorectal cancer in France. Experience in 165,000 people in the department of Calvados].. PubMed. 20(3). 228–36.18 indexed citations
Launoy, Guy, D Pottier, & M Gignoux. (1989). Cancer du côlon proximal et cancer du côlon distal: deux cancers épidémiologiquement différents.. Gastroentérologie Clinique et Biologique. 13(3).1 indexed citations
12.
Gignoux, M, M Gillet, Alexandre Roussel, et al.. (1989). [Adjuvant radiochemotherapy in operable cancers of the thoracic esophagus. Preliminary results of a multicenter study. A study of 119 cases].. PubMed. 43(4). 269–74.10 indexed citations
13.
Ségol, P, et al.. (1982). [Effects of fundoplication on the lower oesophageal sphincter; pre- and post-operative manometric studies (author's transl)].. PubMed. 6(3). 222–8.1 indexed citations
14.
Ségol, P, et al.. (1977). [Radio-surgical treatment of early cancer of the esophagus. Apropos of 8 cases].. PubMed. 103(9). 791–7.2 indexed citations
15.
Roussel, Alexandre, et al.. (1977). [Esophageal cancer in Western France. Retrospective analysis of 1400 cases].. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 64(1). 61–6.3 indexed citations
16.
Gignoux, M, et al.. (1969). A propos d'un cas de kyste hydatique du creux poplité.. 65(6).1 indexed citations
17.
Gignoux, M, et al.. (1969). Scalp libre du cuir chevelu. Reposition immédiate.. 65(3).
18.
Gignoux, M, et al.. (1968). Kyste dysgenétique de la base de la langue.. 17(9).
19.
Gignoux, M, et al.. (1966). A propos d'un cas de laryngocèle.. 15(8).1 indexed citations
20.
Jp, Révillard, et al.. (1962). [Value of methyl-6-prednisolone sodium hemisuccinate (Solumedrol) in the treatment of malignant tumors].. PubMed. 94. 1179–89.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.