Jean‐Claude Dreyfus
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Physiology top 5%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Clinical Biochemistry top 2%
- Co-authors
- G SchapiraAxel KahnFanny SchapiraDominique CottreauLivia PoënaruJoëlle MarieDominique DaegelenJ Kruh
- Topics
- Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (10 papers)Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (10 papers)Pancreatic function and diabetes (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceNetherlandsItaly
In The Last Decade
Jean‐Claude Dreyfus
67 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Molecular Biology 1.0k
- Physiology 462
- Cell Biology 347
- Surgery 324
- Clinical Biochemistry 237
Countries citing papers authored by Jean‐Claude Dreyfus
This map shows the geographic impact of Jean‐Claude Dreyfus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean‐Claude Dreyfus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean‐Claude Dreyfus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jean‐Claude Dreyfus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean‐Claude Dreyfus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean‐Claude Dreyfus. The network helps show where Jean‐Claude Dreyfus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jean‐Claude Dreyfus
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jean‐Claude Dreyfus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jean‐Claude Dreyfus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jean‐Claude Dreyfus. Jean‐Claude Dreyfus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 76 | |
| 6 | 39 | |
| 7 | 86 | |
| 8 | 72 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 110 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | Étude des différences artérioveineuses au cours des myopathies: I. Oxygè ne, glucose et acide lactique 2. Aldolase plasmatique | 7 |
| 16 | 35 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Activités enzymatiques du muscle humain: Recherches sur la biochimie comparée de l'homme normal et myopathique, et du rat | 39 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Jean‐Claude Dreyfus
Jean‐Claude Dreyfus is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Aging and Genetics, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (10 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (10 papers) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (237 citations), Cell Biology (347 citations) and Physiology (462 citations). Jean‐Claude Dreyfus has collaborated with scholars based in France, Netherlands and Italy. Frequent co-authors include G Schapira, Axel Kahn, Fanny Schapira, Dominique Cottreau, Livia Poënaru, Joëlle Marie, Dominique Daegelen, J Kruh, Mariano J. Levin and David Tuil. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.