J.C. Kraak
- Spectroscopy top 0.1%
- Biomedical Engineering top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Analytical Chemistry top 0.1%
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Co-authors
- H. PoppeJ.F.K. HuberFoppe SmedesMarkus BuschSandra BuschF. Bedia ErimGerard BruinG. Stegeman
- Topics
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (91 papers)Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (70 papers)Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (19 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyAustria
In The Last Decade
J.C. Kraak
128 papers receiving 5.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
- Spectroscopy 3.4k
- Biomedical Engineering 3.3k
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
- Analytical Chemistry 1.3k
- Materials Chemistry 400
Countries citing papers authored by J.C. Kraak
This map shows the geographic impact of J.C. Kraak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.C. Kraak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.C. Kraak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J.C. Kraak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.C. Kraak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.C. Kraak. The network helps show where J.C. Kraak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.C. Kraak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.C. Kraak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.C. Kraak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.C. Kraak. J.C. Kraak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vacancy affinity capillary electrophoresis to study competitive protein-drug binding | 2 |
| 2 | 43 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 217 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 89 | |
| 7 | Selectivity change in the separation of proteins and peptides by capillary electrophoresis using high-molecular-mass polyethyleneimine | 31 |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 47 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 183 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 41 | |
| 15 | 109 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 53 | |
| 20 | 29 |
About J.C. Kraak
J.C. Kraak is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Analytical Chemistry and Filtration and Separation, having authored 128 papers that have together received 5.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (91 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (70 papers) and Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (3.4k citations), Analytical Chemistry (1.3k citations) and Biomedical Engineering (3.3k citations). J.C. Kraak has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include H. Poppe, J.F.K. Huber, Foppe Smedes, Markus Busch, Sandra Busch, F. Bedia Erim, Gerard Bruin, G. Stegeman, Wim Th. Kok and Hans F. M. Boelens. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Journal of Chromatography A and Analytica Chimica Acta.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.