Foppe Smedes
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis top 0.2%
- Pollution top 0.5%
- Analytical Chemistry top 0.2%
- Environmental Chemistry top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kees BooijJ.C. KraakTatsiana P. RusinaH. PoppeJana KlánováEvaline M. van WeerleeMichiel T. O. JonkerHedwig M. Sleiderink
- Topics
- Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (45 papers)Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (20 papers)Analytical chemistry methods development (19 papers)
- Partner nations
- CzechiaNetherlandsCanada
In The Last Decade
Foppe Smedes
78 papers receiving 4.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 2.8k
- Pollution 1.7k
- Analytical Chemistry 827
- Environmental Chemistry 455
- Biomedical Engineering 438
Countries citing papers authored by Foppe Smedes
This map shows the geographic impact of Foppe Smedes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Foppe Smedes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Foppe Smedes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Foppe Smedes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Foppe Smedes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Foppe Smedes. The network helps show where Foppe Smedes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Foppe Smedes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Foppe Smedes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Foppe Smedes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Foppe Smedes. Foppe Smedes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 39 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 72 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 107 | |
| 16 | Diffusion coefficients of polychlorinated biphenyls and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in some polymers | 1 |
| 17 | 83 | |
| 18 | 233 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Foppe Smedes
Foppe Smedes is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Analytical Chemistry and Pollution, having authored 79 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (45 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (20 papers) and Analytical chemistry methods development (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (2.8k citations), Pollution (1.7k citations) and Analytical Chemistry (827 citations). Foppe Smedes has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kees Booij, J.C. Kraak, Tatsiana P. Rusina, H. Poppe, Jana Klánová, Evaline M. van Weerlee, Michiel T. O. Jonker, Hedwig M. Sleiderink, Michael Kersten and Branislav Vrana. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Analytical Chemistry and The Science of The Total Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.