Jay Goodliffe

872 citations
28 papers · 514 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Jay Goodliffe

24 papers receiving 455 citations

Peers

Jay Goodliffe
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Political Science and International Relations 352
  • Development 48
  • Communication 69
  • Strategy and Management 110
  • Gender Studies 66
Replace Leon V. Sigal with:
Leon V. Sigal United States
William Wallace United Kingdom
Patrick Müller Austria
David M. McCourt United States
Zach Warner United States
Herbert Reiter Italy
Paul Cornish United Kingdom
Matthew Fuhrmann United States
Diana Fu Canada
John Coggin United States
Jay Goodliffe relative to Leon V. Sigal United States Leon V. Sigal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
Leon V. Sigal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay Goodliffe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Goodliffe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Goodliffe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Goodliffe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Goodliffe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Goodliffe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Goodliffe. The network helps show where Jay Goodliffe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Jay Goodliffe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay Goodliffe Line = papers co-authored together Jay Goodliffe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006146
2 200363
3 199260
4 200157
5 200931
6 201227
7 201826
8 201618
9 200515
10 202412
11 201512
12 200411
13 20079
14 20148
15 20204
16 20034
17 20182
18 20092
19
Dependence Networks and the Diffusion of Democracy
20072
20
How the Internet, BCRA, and Super PACs have Affected Donor Attitudes, Behavior, and Campaigns
20141

About Jay Goodliffe

Jay Goodliffe is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Communication and Gender Studies, having authored 28 papers that have together received 514 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (12 papers), Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Media Influence and Politics (5 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (5 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (4 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (3 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (2 papers) and Populism, Right-Wing Movements (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (352 citations), Development (48 citations), Communication (69 citations), Strategy and Management (110 citations) and Gender Studies (66 citations). Jay Goodliffe has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Darren Hawkins, Eric H. Anderson, Nesbitt W. Hagood, Kelly D. Patterson, Paul S. Herrnson, David B. Magleby, Joseph A. Olsen, Adam R. Brown, Christine Horne and Daniel Nielson. Their work appears in journals such as Political Behavior, The Journal of Politics, Political Research Quarterly, Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy and Comparative Political Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact