Jaume Pahisa
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 0.5%
- Reproductive Medicine top 0.5%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Oncology top 5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Co-authors
- Aureli TornéJaume OrdïXavier FilellaRafael MolinaJ. A. LejárceguiGabriel ZanónJosé Maria AugéSergi Vidal‐Sicart
- Topics
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (43 papers)Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (27 papers)Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (19 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Jaume Pahisa
84 papers receiving 2.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 1.1k
- Reproductive Medicine 862
- Epidemiology 757
- Oncology 754
- Surgery 723
Countries citing papers authored by Jaume Pahisa
This map shows the geographic impact of Jaume Pahisa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaume Pahisa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaume Pahisa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jaume Pahisa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaume Pahisa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaume Pahisa. The network helps show where Jaume Pahisa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jaume Pahisa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jaume Pahisa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jaume Pahisa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jaume Pahisa. Jaume Pahisa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 47 | |
| 9 | 61 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 54 | |
| 15 | 82 | |
| 16 | Prospective evaluation of tumor markers (c-erbB-2 oncoprotein, CEA and CA 15.3) in patients with locoregional breast cancer. | 40 |
| 17 | 36 | |
| 18 | C-erbB-2 oncoprotein in the sera and tissue of patients with breast cancer. Utility in prognosis. | 42 |
| 19 | 100 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Jaume Pahisa
Jaume Pahisa is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Cancer Research, having authored 85 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (43 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (27 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (1.1k citations), Reproductive Medicine (862 citations) and Cancer Research (493 citations). Jaume Pahisa has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Aureli Torné, Jaume Ordï, Xavier Filella, Rafael Molina, J. A. Lejárcegui, Gabriel Zanón, José Maria Augé, Sergi Vidal‐Sicart, José Miguel Escudero Fernández and B. Farrús. Their work appears in journals such as Radiology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and British Journal of Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.