J. A. Lejárcegui

879 citations
21 papers · 674 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

J. A. Lejárcegui

21 papers receiving 648 citations

Peers

J. A. Lejárcegui
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 422
  • Reproductive Medicine 351
  • Cancer Research 99
  • Epidemiology 159
  • Surgery 185
Replace Shinichiro Minobe with:
Shinichiro Minobe Japan
Shih‐Ya Ma Taiwan
Luis Chiva Spain
Denis Heitz France
Marek Pluta Czechia
Kanishka Karunaratne India
JJ Jobsen Netherlands
Mauricio Cuello Fredes Chile
Jaroslav Klát Czechia
M.S. Kao United States
J. A. Lejárcegui relative to Shinichiro Minobe Japan Shinichiro Minobe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Shinichiro Minobe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. A. Lejárcegui

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. A. Lejárcegui's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. A. Lejárcegui with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. A. Lejárcegui more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. A. Lejárcegui

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. A. Lejárcegui. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. A. Lejárcegui. The network helps show where J. A. Lejárcegui may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. A. Lejárcegui, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. A. Lejárcegui Line = papers co-authored together J. A. Lejárcegui links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011133
2 200682
3 200269
4 200754
5 201048
6 200645
7 201037
8 200337
9 200435
10 200834
11
CYFRA 21.1 in patients with cervical cancer: comparison with SCC and CEA.
200533
12 201017
13 200917
14 20077
15 20056
16 20025
17 20065
18 19954
19 20013
20 20022

About J. A. Lejárcegui

J. A. Lejárcegui is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 674 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (10 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (6 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (5 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (4 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (4 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (4 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers) and Cancer and Skin Lesions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (422 citations), Reproductive Medicine (351 citations), Cancer Research (99 citations), Epidemiology (159 citations) and Surgery (185 citations). J. A. Lejárcegui has collaborated with scholars based in Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jaume Pahisa, Aureli Torné, Jaume Ordï, A. Sanjuán, Rafael Molina, Xavier Filella, José Maria Augé, Laura Foj, José Miguel Escudero Fernández and Juan Ramón Ayuso. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica and Gynecologic Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact