Jason Scott Robert

2.0k total citations
60 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Jason Scott Robert is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jason Scott Robert has authored 60 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Molecular Biology, 15 papers in Physiology and 13 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Jason Scott Robert's work include Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (15 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (10 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (9 papers). Jason Scott Robert is often cited by papers focused on Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (15 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (10 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (9 papers). Jason Scott Robert collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Jason Scott Robert's co-authors include Françoise Βaylis, Fiona A. Miller, Mita Giacomini, Robert J. Christensen, Brian K. Hall, Jane Maienschein, Rachel A. Ankeny, Mary E. Sunderland, Richard J. Caselli and Amylou C. Dueck and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, American Journal of Public Health and The FASEB Journal.

In The Last Decade

Jason Scott Robert

57 papers receiving 975 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jason Scott Robert United States 16 268 232 200 191 174 60 1.0k
Nicholas Agar Australia 19 302 1.1× 80 0.3× 324 1.6× 419 2.2× 122 0.7× 114 1.6k
Maurizio Meloni Australia 17 180 0.7× 155 0.7× 39 0.2× 122 0.6× 553 3.2× 51 1.1k
Christoph Rehmann‐Sutter Germany 16 89 0.3× 368 1.6× 75 0.4× 84 0.4× 99 0.6× 85 875
Paula Boddington United Kingdom 14 62 0.2× 268 1.2× 91 0.5× 151 0.8× 173 1.0× 48 931
M. Susan Lindee United States 11 104 0.4× 104 0.4× 60 0.3× 66 0.3× 347 2.0× 27 874
Tansey Em United Kingdom 17 118 0.4× 77 0.3× 56 0.3× 72 0.4× 43 0.2× 156 1.1k
Erik Parens United States 25 243 0.9× 468 2.0× 185 0.9× 591 3.1× 514 3.0× 78 2.2k
Karola Stotz Australia 19 246 0.9× 37 0.2× 34 0.2× 240 1.3× 207 1.2× 29 1.0k
Joseph D. McInerney United States 13 207 0.8× 218 0.9× 43 0.2× 38 0.2× 641 3.7× 55 1.0k
B. Ian Hutchins United States 17 376 1.4× 276 1.2× 31 0.2× 39 0.2× 162 0.9× 26 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Jason Scott Robert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jason Scott Robert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jason Scott Robert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jason Scott Robert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jason Scott Robert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jason Scott Robert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jason Scott Robert. The network helps show where Jason Scott Robert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jason Scott Robert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jason Scott Robert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jason Scott Robert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jason Scott Robert. Jason Scott Robert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Robert, Jason Scott, et al.. (2018). The Reflective Scribe: Encouraging Critical Self-Reflection and Professional Development in Pre-Health Education. Journal of Medical Humanities. 39(4). 447–454. 5 indexed citations
2.
Caselli, Richard J., Gary E. Marchant, Katherine S. Hunt, et al.. (2015). Predictive Testing for Alzheimer’s Disease. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders. 29(3). 252–254. 14 indexed citations
3.
Caselli, Richard J., Jessica B. Langbaum, Gary E. Marchant, et al.. (2014). Public Perceptions of Presymptomatic Testing for Alzheimer Disease. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 89(10). 1389–1396. 58 indexed citations
4.
Haimes, Erica, Loane Skene, Angela Ballantyne, et al.. (2013). Position Statement on the Provision and Procurement of Human Eggs for Stem Cell Research. Cell stem cell. 12(3). 285–291. 6 indexed citations
5.
Kato, Yoshihiro, Jonathan Kimmelman, Jason Scott Robert, Douglas Sipp, & Jeremy Sugarman. (2012). Ethical and Policy Issues in the Clinical Translation of Stem Cells: Report of a Focus Session at the ISSCR Tenth Annual Meeting. Cell stem cell. 11(6). 765–767. 15 indexed citations
6.
Hurlbut, J. Benjamin & Jason Scott Robert. (2012). STEM CELLS, SCIENCE, AND PUBLIC REASONING. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 31(3). 707–714. 3 indexed citations
7.
Maienschein, Jane, Mary E. Sunderland, Rachel A. Ankeny, & Jason Scott Robert. (2008). The Ethos and Ethics of Translational Research. The American Journal of Bioethics. 8(3). 43–51. 70 indexed citations
8.
Miller, Fiona A., Robert J. Christensen, Mita Giacomini, & Jason Scott Robert. (2008). Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants. Journal of Medical Ethics. 34(3). 210–213. 97 indexed citations
9.
Miller, Fiona A., et al.. (2008). When research seems like clinical care: a qualitative study of the communication of individual cancer genetic research results. BMC Medical Ethics. 9(1). 4–4. 35 indexed citations
10.
Giacomini, Mita, Françoise Βaylis, & Jason Scott Robert. (2007). Banking on it: Public policy and the ethics of stem cell research and development. Social Science & Medicine. 65(7). 1490–1500. 25 indexed citations
11.
Robert, Jason Scott. (2007). Taking old ideas seriously: Evolution, development, and human behavior. New Ideas in Psychology. 26(3). 387–404. 19 indexed citations
12.
Robert, Jason Scott, et al.. (2006). The Strange Case of the Humanzee Patent Quest. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly. 6(1). 51–59. 2 indexed citations
13.
Robert, Jason Scott & Françoise Βaylis. (2005). Stem Cell Politics: The NAS Prohibitions Pack More Bark Than Bite. The Hastings Center Report. 35(6). 15–15. 3 indexed citations
14.
Campbell, Richmond & Jason Scott Robert. (2005). The Structure of Evolution by Natural Selection. Biology & Philosophy. 20(4). 673–696. 11 indexed citations
15.
Robert, Jason Scott & Andrea L. Smith. (2004). Toxic Ethics: Environmental Genomics and the Health of Populations. Bioethics. 18(6). 493–514. 8 indexed citations
16.
Robert, Jason Scott. (2004). Model systems in stem cell biology. BioEssays. 26(9). 1005–1012. 26 indexed citations
17.
Βaylis, Françoise & Jason Scott Robert. (2004). The Inevitability of Genetic Enhancement Technologies. Bioethics. 18(1). 1–26. 53 indexed citations
18.
Robert, Jason Scott, et al.. (2001). Bridging the gap between developmental systems theory and evolutionary developmental biology†. BioEssays. 23(10). 954–962. 69 indexed citations
19.
Robert, Jason Scott. (2001). Interpreting the homeobox: metaphors of gene action and activation in development and evolution. Evolution & Development. 3(4). 287–295. 32 indexed citations
20.
Robert, Jason Scott. (2000). Schizophrenia Epigenesis?. Metamedicine. 21(2). 191–215. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026