Jason Scott Robert
- Molecular Biology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Physiology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- Françoise ΒaylisFiona A. MillerMita GiacominiRobert J. ChristensenBrian K. HallJane MaienscheinRachel A. AnkenyMary E. Sunderland
- Topics
- Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (15 papers)Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (10 papers)Ethics in Clinical Research (9 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesAmerican Journal of Public HealthThe FASEB Journal
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Jason Scott Robert
57 papers receiving 975 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
- Molecular Biology 268
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 232
- Physiology 200
- Cognitive Neuroscience 191
- Genetics 174
Countries citing papers authored by Jason Scott Robert
This map shows the geographic impact of Jason Scott Robert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jason Scott Robert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jason Scott Robert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jason Scott Robert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jason Scott Robert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jason Scott Robert. The network helps show where Jason Scott Robert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jason Scott Robert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jason Scott Robert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jason Scott Robert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jason Scott Robert. Jason Scott Robert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 58 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 70 | |
| 8 | 97 | |
| 9 | 35 | |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 53 | |
| 18 | 69 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Jason Scott Robert
Jason Scott Robert is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, General Psychology and Health Informatics, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (15 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (10 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (120 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (191 citations) and General Psychology (10 citations). Jason Scott Robert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Françoise Βaylis, Fiona A. Miller, Mita Giacomini, Robert J. Christensen, Brian K. Hall, Jane Maienschein, Rachel A. Ankeny, Mary E. Sunderland, Richard J. Caselli and Amylou C. Dueck. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, American Journal of Public Health and The FASEB Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.