Christopher Thomas Scott
- Molecular Biology
- Physiology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Timothy CaulfieldDavid MagnusJudy IllesMindy C. DeRouenJohn P. NelsonCynthia SelinJacob S. SherkowLaura DeFrancesco
- Topics
- Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (35 papers)Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (19 papers)CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Christopher Thomas Scott
55 papers receiving 717 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Molecular Biology 418
- Physiology 304
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 177
- Biomedical Engineering 76
- Reproductive Medicine 73
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Thomas Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Thomas Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Thomas Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Thomas Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Thomas Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Thomas Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Thomas Scott. The network helps show where Christopher Thomas Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Thomas Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Thomas Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Thomas Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Thomas Scott. Christopher Thomas Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 32 | |
| 4 | The Pick-and-Shovel Play: Bioethics for Gene-Editing Vector Patents | 2 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 42 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 61 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | Pluripotent Patents Make Prime Time: An Analysis of the Emerging Landscape | 1 |
| 16 | 74 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About Christopher Thomas Scott
Christopher Thomas Scott is a scholar working on Business and International Management, Physiology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 56 papers that have together received 767 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (35 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (19 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (37 citations), Physiology (304 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (73 citations). Christopher Thomas Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Timothy Caulfield, David Magnus, Judy Illes, Mindy C. DeRouen, John P. Nelson, Cynthia Selin, Jacob S. Sherkow, Laura DeFrancesco, Insoo Hyun and Monya Baker. Their work appears in journals such as Cell, Nature Biotechnology and Nature Methods.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.