Jason Gow

1.9k total citations
64 papers, 509 citations indexed

About

Jason Gow is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Aerospace Engineering and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Jason Gow has authored 64 papers receiving a total of 509 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 51 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 31 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 20 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in Jason Gow's work include CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (49 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (21 papers) and Particle Detector Development and Performance (20 papers). Jason Gow is often cited by papers focused on CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (49 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (21 papers) and Particle Detector Development and Performance (20 papers). Jason Gow collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Jason Gow's co-authors include Andrew D. Holland, Neil J. Murray, David Hall, David Burt, A. S. Clarke, David R. Smith, Konstantin D. Stefanov, Peter Pool, J Endicott and Matthew R. Soman and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

In The Last Decade

Jason Gow

62 papers receiving 500 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jason Gow United Kingdom 13 398 230 129 110 88 64 509
I. Kuvvetli Denmark 14 422 1.1× 34 0.1× 88 0.7× 77 0.7× 48 0.5× 45 535
Miguel Sofo-Haro Argentina 7 153 0.4× 32 0.1× 79 0.6× 286 2.6× 92 1.0× 19 380
C. Budtz‐Jørgensen Denmark 12 325 0.8× 25 0.1× 123 1.0× 74 0.7× 42 0.5× 34 467
Alexander B. Walter United States 11 161 0.4× 25 0.1× 186 1.4× 30 0.3× 125 1.4× 28 360
Robert Andritschke Germany 13 168 0.4× 39 0.2× 219 1.7× 411 3.7× 34 0.4× 77 626
Anthony Scopatz United States 7 126 0.3× 64 0.3× 73 0.6× 70 0.6× 95 1.1× 19 299
T. Yamazaki Japan 13 101 0.3× 78 0.3× 47 0.4× 210 1.9× 234 2.7× 40 411
H. Katagiri Japan 11 124 0.3× 47 0.2× 192 1.5× 233 2.1× 44 0.5× 61 447
L. Latronico Italy 15 224 0.6× 20 0.1× 141 1.1× 568 5.2× 33 0.4× 57 628
G. Varner United States 14 232 0.6× 14 0.1× 45 0.3× 390 3.5× 73 0.8× 70 598

Countries citing papers authored by Jason Gow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jason Gow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jason Gow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jason Gow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jason Gow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jason Gow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jason Gow. The network helps show where Jason Gow may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jason Gow

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jason Gow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jason Gow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jason Gow. Jason Gow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Patel, Manish, V. K. Pearson, David J. Evans, et al.. (2019). The transfer of unsterilized material from Mars to Phobos: Laboratory tests, modelling and statistical evaluation. Life Sciences in Space Research. 23. 112–134. 1 indexed citations
2.
Skottfelt, J., David Hall, Jason Gow, et al.. (2017). Comparing simulations and test data of a radiation damaged charge-coupled device for the Euclid mission. Open Research Online (The Open University). 7 indexed citations
3.
Hall, David, Jason Gow, J. Skottfelt, et al.. (2017). Evolution and Impact of Defects in a p-Channel CCD After Cryogenic Proton-Irradiation. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 64(11). 2814–2821. 7 indexed citations
4.
Soman, Matthew R., Andrew D. Holland, Konstantin D. Stefanov, et al.. (2016). Electro-optic and radiation damage performance of the CIS115, an imaging sensor for the JANUS optical camera onboard JUICE. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9915. 991515–991515. 7 indexed citations
5.
Hall, David, et al.. (2016). A study of the double-acceptor level of the silicon divacancy in a proton irradiated n-channel CCD. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9915. 99150J–99150J. 4 indexed citations
6.
Athiray, P. S., et al.. (2016). Modeling charge transport in Swept Charge Devices for X-ray spectroscopy.
7.
Hall, David, et al.. (2016). Evolution of proton-induced defects in a cryogenically irradiated p-channel CCD. 7742. 1–4. 1 indexed citations
8.
Athiray, P. S., P. Sreekumar, S. Narendranath, & Jason Gow. (2015). Simulating charge transport to understand the spectral response of Swept Charge Devices. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 5 indexed citations
9.
Harding, Leon K., Richard Demers, Michael E. Hoenk, et al.. (2015). Electron multiplication CCD detector technology advancement for the WFIRST-AFTA coronagraph. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9605. 96050F–96050F. 7 indexed citations
10.
Śmiałek, Małgorzata A., Sylwia Ptasińska, Jason Gow, Chiara Da Pieve, & N. J. Mason. (2014). Radiosensitization of DNA in presence of Pt(II)-based compounds. The European Physical Journal D. 68(4). 4 indexed citations
11.
Hall, David, et al.. (2014). In situtrap parameter studies in CCDs for space applications. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9154. 915408–915408. 4 indexed citations
12.
Stefanov, Konstantin D., et al.. (2013). Total ionizing dose effects on I-V and noise characteristics of MOS transistors in a 0.18 μm CMOS Image Sensor process. Open Research Online (The Open University). 1–5. 7 indexed citations
13.
Clarke, A. S., David Hall, Neil J. Murray, et al.. (2013). Pixel-level modelling and verification for the EUCLID VIS CCD. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8860. 88600V–88600V. 7 indexed citations
14.
Smith, Paul, et al.. (2013). Responsivity mapping techniques for the non-positional CCD: the swept charge device CCD236. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8859. 88590M–88590M. 1 indexed citations
15.
Gow, Jason, Neil J. Murray, Andrew D. Holland, David Burt, & Peter Pool. (2012). Comparison of proton irradiated P-channel and N-channel CCDs. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 686. 15–19. 7 indexed citations
16.
Endicott, J, David Burt, Tim V. Eaton, et al.. (2012). Charge-coupled devices for the ESA Euclid M-class Mission. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8453. 845304–845304. 22 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Paul, Jason Gow, Neil J. Murray, et al.. (2012). Performance of new generation swept charge devices for lunar x-ray spectroscopy on Chandrayaan-2. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8453. 84530R–84530R. 3 indexed citations
18.
Narendranath, S., Anurag Tyagi, R. Kulkarni, et al.. (2011). The Chandrayaan-2 Large Area Soft X-ray Spectrometer (CLASS). Open Research Online (The Open University). 1708. 7 indexed citations
19.
Gow, Jason, Andrew D. Holland, & Peter Pool. (2009). Proton radiation damage study of the next generation of swept charge devices. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7435. 74350V–74350V. 2 indexed citations
20.
Gow, Jason, et al.. (2004). Development and testing of an active area neutron dosemeter. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 110(1-4). 263–266. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by I. Kuvvetli Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Miguel Sofo-Haro Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. Budtz‐Jørgensen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alexander B. Walter Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert Andritschke Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anthony Scopatz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by T. Yamazaki Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by H. Katagiri Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by L. Latronico Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G. Varner
Rankless by CCL
2026