David Burt

1.5k total citations
77 papers, 958 citations indexed

About

David Burt is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Aerospace Engineering and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, David Burt has authored 77 papers receiving a total of 958 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 61 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 30 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 20 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in David Burt's work include CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (56 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (24 papers) and Particle Detector Development and Performance (20 papers). David Burt is often cited by papers focused on CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (56 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (24 papers) and Particle Detector Development and Performance (20 papers). David Burt collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Australia. David Burt's co-authors include Andrew D. Holland, Neil J. Murray, Peter L. Russell, Ray Bell, David Hall, Jason Gow, Paul Jerram, Peter Pool, Ian Moody and A. S. Clarke and has published in prestigious journals such as Optics Express, Chemical Engineering Science and IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

In The Last Decade

David Burt

74 papers receiving 917 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Burt United Kingdom 15 584 247 188 157 151 77 958
B. Turko United States 14 248 0.4× 73 0.3× 151 0.8× 135 0.9× 79 0.5× 63 494
Levent Cibik Germany 11 124 0.2× 58 0.2× 281 1.5× 68 0.4× 95 0.6× 37 442
Andrew Holmes‐Siedle United Kingdom 24 1.4k 2.4× 110 0.4× 493 2.6× 182 1.2× 127 0.8× 96 1.9k
Heishun Zen Japan 13 243 0.4× 101 0.4× 179 1.0× 80 0.5× 87 0.6× 150 612
J.A. Clarke United Kingdom 11 439 0.8× 166 0.7× 161 0.9× 108 0.7× 175 1.2× 67 692
Stuart Kleinfelder United States 11 214 0.4× 33 0.1× 75 0.4× 148 0.9× 51 0.3× 38 422
Jinshou Tian China 13 262 0.4× 20 0.1× 104 0.6× 154 1.0× 204 1.4× 130 727
Jiaru Shi China 14 551 0.9× 397 1.6× 162 0.9× 115 0.7× 97 0.6× 116 826
G. Deptuch United States 21 1.1k 1.9× 23 0.1× 720 3.8× 1.1k 6.8× 213 1.4× 121 1.4k
Antonino Miceli United States 11 173 0.3× 10 0.0× 198 1.1× 38 0.2× 84 0.6× 59 577

Countries citing papers authored by David Burt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Burt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Burt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Burt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Burt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Burt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Burt. The network helps show where David Burt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Burt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Burt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Burt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Burt. David Burt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Brookes, Tim, et al.. (2024). 55 μm-pitch indium bump deposition on MEDIPIX single die without using photolithography. Journal of Instrumentation. 19(12). C12008–C12008.
2.
Schneider, Andreas, et al.. (2024). Single Die Process Using Shadow Masks for a 55µm Fine Pitch Array of 4µm-Tall Indium Bumps Across an Entire Chip. Science and Technology Facilities Council. A 633. 1–4. 1 indexed citations
3.
Perrella, Christopher, et al.. (2023). Free-induction-decay magnetic field imaging with a microfabricated Cs vapor cell. Optics Express. 31(20). 33582–33582. 8 indexed citations
4.
Stefanov, Konstantin D., et al.. (2013). Total ionizing dose effects on I-V and noise characteristics of MOS transistors in a 0.18 μm CMOS Image Sensor process. Open Research Online (The Open University). 1–5. 7 indexed citations
5.
Clarke, A. S., David Hall, Neil J. Murray, et al.. (2013). Pixel-level modelling and verification for the EUCLID VIS CCD. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8860. 88600V–88600V. 7 indexed citations
6.
Castro, Fernanda, Shekhar Krishnan, Georgi K. Marinov, et al.. (2012). 5T4 oncofetal antigen is expressed in high risk of relapse childhood pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia and is associated with a more invasive and chemotactic phenotype. Leukemia. 26(7). 1487–1498. 24 indexed citations
7.
Gow, Jason, Neil J. Murray, Andrew D. Holland, David Burt, & Peter Pool. (2012). Comparison of proton irradiated P-channel and N-channel CCDs. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 686. 15–19. 7 indexed citations
8.
Elkord, Eyad & David Burt. (2011). Novel IFNγ ELISPOT Assay for Detection of Functional Carcinoembryonic Antigen‐Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor‐Redirected T Cells. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology. 74(4). 419–422. 2 indexed citations
9.
Murray, Neil J., Andrew D. Holland, James H. Tutt, et al.. (2010). Off-plane x-ray grating spectrometer camera for IXO. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7742. 77420X–77420X. 1 indexed citations
10.
Jorden, Paul, Ray Bell, David Burt, et al.. (2006). Commercialization of full depletion scientific CCDs. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6276. 627604–627604. 10 indexed citations
11.
Holland, Andrew D., M. A. C. Perryman, Ian B. Hutchinson, et al.. (2004). Development of the CCDs for ESA GAIA cornerstone mission. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5167. 38–38. 1 indexed citations
12.
Aebi, Verle W., J. Edgecumbe, John J. Boyle, et al.. (1998). <title>Gallium-arsenide electron-bombarded CCD technology</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 3434. 37–44. 1 indexed citations
13.
Burt, David. (1997). Policies for the Use of Public Internet Workstations in Public Libraries.. 36(3). 2 indexed citations
14.
Burt, David. (1997). In Defense of Filtering.. American libraries. 28(7). 3 indexed citations
15.
Holland, A. D., Martin Turner, A. A. Wells, & David Burt. (1992). CCD's on high resistivity bulk silicon for X-ray spectroscopy on XMM.. ESASP. 356. 321–324.
16.
Burt, David & Peter L. Russell. (1983). Gelatinization of Low Water Content Wheat Starch — Water Mixtures. A Combined Study by Differential Scanning Calorimetry and Light Microscopy. Starch - Stärke. 35(10). 354–360. 74 indexed citations
17.
Burt, David & Tom Fearn. (1983). A Quantitative Study of Biscuit Microstructure. Starch - Stärke. 35(10). 351–354. 11 indexed citations
18.
Burt, David. (1980). Development of c.c.d. area image sensors for 625-line television applications. Radio and Electronic Engineer. 50(5). 205–205. 3 indexed citations
19.
Burt, David. (1979). Fabrication technology for charge-coupled devices. 81–102. 2 indexed citations
20.
Burt, David. (1975). Charge-coupled devices and their applications. Electronics and Power. 21(2). 93–93. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026