Jasmin Neßler

39 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers

Jasmin Neßler
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Developmental Neuroscience 35
  • Health Informatics 9
  • Neurology 43
  • Rehabilitation 27
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 56
Replace Henning Schenk with:
Henning Schenk Germany
Ross A. Jones United Kingdom
João Aris Kouyoumdjian Brazil
Umberto Tosi United States
Roberto Poma Canada
Eva Skiöldebrand Sweden
Imre Gerlinger Hungary
Shannon P. Holmes United States
Monica A. Pessina United States
Andrea M. Sartori Switzerland
Jasmin Neßler relative to Henning Schenk Germany Henning Schenk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Henning Schenk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jasmin Neßler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jasmin Neßler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jasmin Neßler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jasmin Neßler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jasmin Neßler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jasmin Neßler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jasmin Neßler. The network helps show where Jasmin Neßler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jasmin Neßler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jasmin Neßler Line = papers co-authored together Jasmin Neßler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202149
2 201340
3 200440
4 201418
5 201717
6 202017
7 201914
8 202212
9 202111
10 201910
11 20169
12 20208
13 20228
14 20208
15 20218
16 20207
17 20217
18 20237
19 20237
20 20186

About Jasmin Neßler

Jasmin Neßler is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (9 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (8 papers), Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (6 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (4 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (4 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (3 papers), Veterinary Oncology Research (3 papers) and RNA regulation and disease (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (35 citations), Health Informatics (9 citations), Neurology (43 citations), Rehabilitation (27 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (56 citations). Jasmin Neßler has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Andrea Tipold, Martin Stangel, Peter Hoffmann, Karelle Bénardais, K.‐H. Waldmann, Christine Radtke, Catherine Helmer, Viktoria Gudi, P.M. Vogt and Gudrun Brandes. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Veterinary Science, BMC Veterinary Research, Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, PLoS ONE and Animals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact