Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke

684 total citations
22 papers, 480 citations indexed

About

Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke is a scholar working on Building and Construction, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 480 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Building and Construction, 12 papers in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and 5 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke's work include Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production (12 papers), Renewable Energy and Sustainability (6 papers) and Biofuel production and bioconversion (5 papers). Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke is often cited by papers focused on Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production (12 papers), Renewable Energy and Sustainability (6 papers) and Biofuel production and bioconversion (5 papers). Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke collaborates with scholars based in Germany and Canada. Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke's co-authors include Jan Liebetrau, Michael Nelles, Walter Stinner, Carsten Cuhls, Joachim Clemens, Peter Weiland, Daniela Thrän, Jens Ponitka, Lukas Kranzl and Günther Bochmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Waste Management, Geoderma and Biomass and Bioenergy.

In The Last Decade

Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke

19 papers receiving 460 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke Germany 10 211 106 82 78 78 22 480
Omar Hijazi Germany 10 221 1.0× 95 0.9× 67 0.8× 97 1.2× 121 1.6× 21 551
Jan Bekkering Netherlands 11 145 0.7× 78 0.7× 76 0.9× 66 0.8× 73 0.9× 16 383
Patrick Mukumba South Africa 13 276 1.3× 162 1.5× 65 0.8× 126 1.6× 62 0.8× 59 671
Nur Izzah Hamna A. Aziz Malaysia 8 94 0.4× 117 1.1× 73 0.9× 79 1.0× 58 0.7× 10 445
Rubén González Spain 13 220 1.0× 147 1.4× 63 0.8× 72 0.9× 54 0.7× 29 489
Nóra Szarka Germany 12 106 0.5× 115 1.1× 95 1.2× 80 1.0× 95 1.2× 28 517
Bianca Zerhusen Germany 3 153 0.7× 63 0.6× 36 0.4× 52 0.7× 65 0.8× 6 309
Daniel Köster Luxembourg 9 124 0.6× 82 0.8× 74 0.9× 50 0.6× 86 1.1× 14 413
Robert Bedoić Croatia 10 149 0.7× 144 1.4× 36 0.4× 63 0.8× 31 0.4× 12 413
Funda Cansu Ertem Germany 8 97 0.5× 77 0.7× 53 0.6× 75 1.0× 45 0.6× 9 355

Countries citing papers authored by Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke. The network helps show where Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke. Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Thrän, Daniela, et al.. (2025). Potential contribution of biogas to net zero energy systems – A comparative study of Canada and Germany. Biomass and Bioenergy. 193. 107561–107561. 7 indexed citations
2.
Cuhls, Carsten, et al.. (2025). Greenhouse gas emissions from anaerobic and aerobic treatment of biowaste and green waste. Waste Management. 207. 115097–115097.
3.
Jordan, Matthias, Kathleen Meisel, Martin Dotzauer, et al.. (2024). Do current energy policies in Germany promote the use of biomass in areas where it is particularly beneficial to the system? Analysing short- and long-term energy scenarios. Energy Sustainability and Society. 14(1). 1 indexed citations
4.
Meisel, Kathleen, Matthias Jordan, Martin Dotzauer, et al.. (2024). Quo Vadis, Biomass? Long‐Term Scenarios of an Optimal Energetic Use of Biomass for the German Energy Transition. International Journal of Energy Research. 2024(1). 4 indexed citations
5.
Jordan, Matthias, Kathleen Meisel, Martin Dotzauer, et al.. (2023). The controversial role of energy crops in the future German energy system: The trade offs of a phase-out and allocation priorities of the remaining biomass residues. Energy Reports. 10. 3848–3858. 11 indexed citations
6.
O’Keeffe, S., Uwe Franko, Katja Oehmichen, Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke, & Daniela Thrän. (2019). Give them credit‐the greenhouse gas performance of regional biogas systems. GCB Bioenergy. 11(6). 791–808. 9 indexed citations
7.
Daniel‐Gromke, Jaqueline, et al.. (2019). Wärmenutzung von Biogasanlagen. Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden). 1 indexed citations
8.
Liebetrau, Jan, et al.. (2019). Aktuelle Entwicklungen bei der Erzeugung und Nutzung von Biogas. 13–30. 2 indexed citations
9.
Daniel‐Gromke, Jaqueline, et al.. (2019). Biogas and biomethane in Europe: lessons from Denmark, Germany and Italy. 28 indexed citations
10.
Kaltschmitt, Martin, et al.. (2019). Erneuerbare Energien. 71(6). 60–88.
11.
O’Keeffe, S., et al.. (2018). Biogas production and changes in soil carbon input - A regional analysis. Geoderma. 320. 105–114. 14 indexed citations
12.
Daniel‐Gromke, Jaqueline, et al.. (2017). Anlagenbestand Biogas und Biomethan: Biogaserzeugung und -nutzung in Deutschland. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 22 indexed citations
13.
Daniel‐Gromke, Jaqueline, et al.. (2017). Efficient Small-Scale Biogas Upgrading Plants - Potential Analysis and Economic Assessment. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 1105–1109. 1 indexed citations
14.
Daniel‐Gromke, Jaqueline, et al.. (2017). Current Developments in Production and Utilization of Biogas and Biomethane in Germany. Chemie Ingenieur Technik. 90(1-2). 17–35. 133 indexed citations
15.
Daniel‐Gromke, Jaqueline, et al.. (2016). Analyses of Regional Biogas Potentials in Turkey. 184–191.
16.
Daniel‐Gromke, Jaqueline, et al.. (2015). Digestion of bio-waste - GHG emissions and mitigation potential. Energy Sustainability and Society. 5(1). 39 indexed citations
17.
Daniel‐Gromke, Jaqueline, et al.. (2014). Biomethane: Status and Factors Affecting Market Development and Trade. Joint Research Centre (European Commission). 75 indexed citations
18.
Adler, Philipp, et al.. (2014). Leitfaden Biogasaufbereitung und -einspeisung. TIB Hannover. 18 indexed citations
19.
Oehmichen, Katja, Jaqueline Daniel‐Gromke, Walter Stinner, et al.. (2012). Nachhaltige europäische Biomethanstrategie : Endbericht. Publication Server of the Wuppertal Institute (Wuppertal Institute). 1 indexed citations
20.
Liebetrau, Jan, et al.. (2010). Methane emissions from biogas‐producing facilities within the agricultural sector. Engineering in Life Sciences. 10(6). 595–599. 75 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026