Georgia Erdmann
Impact in
-
- Study of Mite Species
- Plant and animal studies
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 3
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 3
-
- Study of Mite Species 5
- Plant and animal studies 4
- Co-authors
- Stefan ScheuMark MaraunMelanie M. PolliererRoy A. NortonBarbara FischerKatja SchneiderRoswitha B. EhnesAndré Brosowski
- Journals
- Experimental and Applied Acarology (2 papers)Oikos (2 papers)Ecology (1 paper)Pedobiologia (1 paper)Oecologia (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyKazakhstanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Georgia Erdmann
14 papers receiving 673 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 356
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 168
- Insect Science 164
- Ecology 305
- Ecological Modeling 27
Countries citing papers authored by Georgia Erdmann
This map shows the geographic impact of Georgia Erdmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Georgia Erdmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Georgia Erdmann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Georgia Erdmann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Georgia Erdmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Georgia Erdmann. The network helps show where Georgia Erdmann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Georgia Erdmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 35 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 143 | |
| 5 | Biomassepotenziale von Rest- und Abfallstoffen: Status Quo in Deutschland | 2015 | 10 |
| 6 | 2014 | 50 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 8 | Positive correlation between density and parthenogenetic reproduction in oribatid mites (Acari) supports the structured resource theory of sexual reproduction | 2012 | 25 |
| 9 | 2012 | 83 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 147 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 47 | |
| 12 | 07. A comparative study of predator-induced social aggregation of tadpoles in two anuran species from western Madagascar | 2007 | 11 |
| 13 | 2007 | 73 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 30 |
About Georgia Erdmann
Georgia Erdmann is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Ecology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 698 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Study of Mite Species (5 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (4 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (3 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (3 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (3 papers) and Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (356 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (168 citations), Insect Science (164 citations), Ecology (305 citations) and Ecological Modeling (27 citations). Georgia Erdmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Kazakhstan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Scheu, Mark Maraun, Melanie M. Pollierer, Roy A. Norton, Barbara Fischer, Katja Schneider, Roswitha B. Ehnes, André Brosowski, Reinhard Langel and Volker Otte. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental and Applied Acarology, Oikos, Ecology, Pedobiologia and Oecologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.