Janine Reis

8.6k citations
55 papers · 5.4k indexed · 3 hit papers · h-index 28

Janine Reis

51 papers receiving 5.3k citations

Hit Papers

TMS and drugs revisited 201451220092026201420202505007501000

Peers

Janine Reis
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Neurology 4.0k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.8k
  • Rehabilitation 558
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 893
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 249
Replace Paolo Profice with:
Paolo Profice Italy
Fabio Pilato Italy
Min‐Fang Kuo Germany
Heidi M. Schambra United States
Federico Ranieri Italy
A. Pascual–Leone United States
Brita Fritsch Germany
Patrick Ragert Germany
M. Dileone Italy
Zsigmond Tamás Kincses Hungary
Janine Reis relative to Paolo Profice Italy Paolo Profice's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Paolo Profice · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janine Reis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janine Reis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janine Reis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janine Reis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janine Reis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janine Reis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janine Reis. The network helps show where Janine Reis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janine Reis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janine Reis Line = papers co-authored together Janine Reis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20233
2 202122
3 20171
4 20162
5 201560
6 2015107
7 201437
8
TMS and drugs revisited 2014breakdown →
2014512
9 201427
10 2013123
11
Direct Current Stimulation Promotes BDNF-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity: Potential Implications for Motor Learningbreakdown →
20101054
12 201046
13
Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidationbreakdown →
20091060
14 2008210
15 200628
16 20066
17 200696
18 200644
19 200538
20 200447

About Janine Reis

Janine Reis is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 55 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (37 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (11 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (10 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (9 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (7 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (6 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (6 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (4.0k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.8k citations) and Rehabilitation (558 citations). Janine Reis has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Brita Fritsch, Leonardo G. Cohen, Heidi M. Schambra, Pablo Celnik, John W. Krakauer, Keri Martinowich, Bai Lu, Yuanyuan Ji, Ethan R. Buch and Eric Zarahn. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Neurophysiology, Brain stimulation, Journal of Visualized Experiments, Epilepsy Research and Epilepsia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026