Janice M. Pluth

1.2k total citations
34 papers, 977 citations indexed

About

Janice M. Pluth is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cancer Research and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Janice M. Pluth has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 977 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Molecular Biology, 16 papers in Cancer Research and 13 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Janice M. Pluth's work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (22 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (14 papers) and Effects of Radiation Exposure (13 papers). Janice M. Pluth is often cited by papers focused on DNA Repair Mechanisms (22 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (14 papers) and Effects of Radiation Exposure (13 papers). Janice M. Pluth collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Janice M. Pluth's co-authors include Francis A. Cucinotta, Sylvain V. Costes, Burkhard Jakob, Mary Helen Barcellos‐Hoff, Irene Chiolo, Peter O’Neill, James D. Tucker, Jennifer A. Anderson, Marilyn J. Ramsey and Jane Harper and has published in prestigious journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Molecular Cell and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Janice M. Pluth

33 papers receiving 965 citations

Peers

Janice M. Pluth
Jayne Moquet United Kingdom
Thomas A. Winters United States
Paul Finnon United Kingdom
Janapriya Saha United States
Stephen Barnard United Kingdom
Peter J. Johnston United Kingdom
Simon P. Keam Australia
Janice M. Pluth
Citations per year, relative to Janice M. Pluth Janice M. Pluth (= 1×) peers Georgia I. Terzoudi

Countries citing papers authored by Janice M. Pluth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janice M. Pluth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice M. Pluth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice M. Pluth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janice M. Pluth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice M. Pluth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice M. Pluth. The network helps show where Janice M. Pluth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janice M. Pluth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janice M. Pluth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janice M. Pluth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janice M. Pluth. Janice M. Pluth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sridharan, Deepa, et al.. (2024). Modeling Radiation-Induced Epithelial Cell Injury in Murine Three-Dimensional Esophageal Organoids. Biomolecules. 14(5). 519–519.
2.
Chien, Lung-Chang, et al.. (2023). Influence of Simulated Microgravity on Mammary Epithelial Cells Grown as 2D and 3D Cultures. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 24(8). 7615–7615. 2 indexed citations
3.
Wu, Xiaogang, et al.. (2022). XRCC4 and MRE11 Roles and Transcriptional Response to Repair of TALEN-Induced Double-Strand DNA Breaks. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 23(2). 593–593. 3 indexed citations
4.
Sridharan, Deepa, et al.. (2021). Effects of Radiation on Mitochondrial Defective Lymphoblastoid Cells. 6(4). 1 indexed citations
5.
Sridharan, Deepa, Lung-Chang Chien, Francis A. Cucinotta, & Janice M. Pluth. (2020). Comparison of signaling profiles in the low dose range following low and high LET radiation. Life Sciences in Space Research. 25. 28–41. 4 indexed citations
6.
Sridharan, Deepa, et al.. (2020). Dose Fractionation During Puberty Is More Detrimental to Mammary Gland Development Than an Equivalent Acute Dose of Radiation Exposure. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 109(5). 1521–1532. 1 indexed citations
7.
Trego, Kelly S., Albert R. Davalos, Ann Christin Parplys, et al.. (2016). Non-catalytic Roles for XPG with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Homologous Recombination and Genome Stability. Molecular Cell. 61(4). 535–546. 45 indexed citations
8.
Sridharan, Deepa, Aroumougame Asaithamby, Steve R. Blattnig, et al.. (2016). Evaluating biomarkers to model cancer risk post cosmic ray exposure. Life Sciences in Space Research. 9. 19–47. 34 indexed citations
9.
Sridharan, Deepa, Aroumougame Asaithamby, Susan M. Bailey, et al.. (2015). Understanding Cancer Development Processes after HZE-Particle Exposure: Roles of ROS, DNA Damage Repair and Inflammation. Radiation Research. 183(1). 1–26. 93 indexed citations
10.
Wang, Minli, Megumi Hada, Janice L. Huff, et al.. (2012). Heavy Ions Can Enhance TGFβ Mediated Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition. Journal of Radiation Research. 53(1). 51–57. 14 indexed citations
11.
Wang, Minli, Janapriya Saha, Megumi Hada, et al.. (2012). Novel Smad proteins localize to IR-induced double-strand breaks: interplay between TGFβ and ATM pathways. Nucleic Acids Research. 41(2). 933–942. 51 indexed citations
12.
Hu, Shaowen, Janice M. Pluth, & Francis A. Cucinotta. (2011). Putative binding modes of Ku70-SAP domain with double strand DNA: a molecular modeling study. Journal of Molecular Modeling. 18(5). 2163–2174. 16 indexed citations
13.
Hada, Megumi, Janice L. Huff, Zarana S. Patel, et al.. (2011). AT cells are not radiosensitive for simple chromosomal exchanges at low dose. Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis. 716(1-2). 76–83. 12 indexed citations
14.
George, K., Megumi Hada, Todd F. Elliott, et al.. (2009). Dose Response of γ Rays and Iron Nuclei for Induction of Chromosomal Aberrations in Normal and Repair-Deficient Cell Lines. Radiation Research. 171(6). 752–763. 37 indexed citations
15.
Pluth, Janice M., et al.. (2008). Specific ATM-Mediated Phosphorylation Dependent on Radiation Quality. Radiation Research. 170(3). 353–364. 31 indexed citations
16.
Cucinotta, Francis A., Janice M. Pluth, Jennifer A. Anderson, Jane Harper, & Peter O’Neill. (2008). Biochemical Kinetics Model of DSB Repair and Induction of γ-H2AX Foci by Non-homologous End Joining. Radiation Research. 169(2). 214–222. 108 indexed citations
17.
Pluth, Janice M., et al.. (2007). DNA double-strand break and chromosomal rejoining defects with misrejoining in Nijmegen breakage syndrome cells. DNA repair. 7(1). 108–118. 17 indexed citations
18.
Wang, Junhua, Janice M. Pluth, Priscilla K. Cooper, et al.. (2005). Artemis deficiency confers a DNA double-strand break repair defect and Artemis phosphorylation status is altered by DNA damage and cell cycle progression. DNA repair. 4(5). 556–570. 81 indexed citations
19.
Pluth, Janice M., David Nelson, Marilyn J. Ramsey, & James D. Tucker. (2000). The relationship between genotype and chromosome aberration frequencies in a normal adult population. Pharmacogenetics. 10(4). 311–319. 21 indexed citations
20.
Johnson, Kirby L., J. Nath, Janice M. Pluth, & James D. Tucker. (1999). The distribution of chromosome damage, non-reciprocal translocations and clonal aberrations in lymphocytes from Chernobyl clean-up workers. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 439(1). 77–85. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026