Janice Bissonnette
Impact in
- Family Practice top 5%
- Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Transplantation top 10%
- Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Health Policy Implementation Science 1
- Health Sciences Research and Education 1
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 1
- Health, psychology, and well-being 1
-
- Medication Adherence and Compliance 2
- Co-authors
- Greg Knoll (2 shared papers)Dawn Stacey (2 shared papers)Ian D. Graham (2 shared papers)Jo Logan (2 shared papers)Kirsten Woodend (1 shared paper)B. E. Davies (1 shared paper)Margaret B. Harrison (1 shared paper)Shaurya Taran (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Janice Bissonnette
8 papers receiving 291 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Family Practice 54
- Transplantation 22
- Nephrology 57
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 6
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 16
Countries citing papers authored by Janice Bissonnette
This map shows the geographic impact of Janice Bissonnette's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice Bissonnette with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice Bissonnette more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janice Bissonnette
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice Bissonnette. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice Bissonnette. The network helps show where Janice Bissonnette may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janice Bissonnette, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 112 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 40 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 39 | |
| 4 | Evidence-based pressure-ulcer practice: the Ottawa model of research use. | 1999 | 38 |
| 5 | 2013 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 4 |
About Janice Bissonnette
Janice Bissonnette is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Family Practice, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 8 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Health, psychology, and well-being (1 paper) and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (54 citations), Transplantation (22 citations), Nephrology (57 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (6 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (16 citations). Janice Bissonnette has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Greg Knoll, Dawn Stacey, Ian D. Graham, Jo Logan, Kirsten Woodend, B. E. Davies, Margaret B. Harrison, Shaurya Taran, Manish M. Sood and Wendy Gifford. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Seminars in Dialysis, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Clinical Nursing Research and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.