Cheryl Rucker‐Whitaker
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Surgery
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Family Practice top 5%
- Co-authors
- James E. CalvinLynda H. PowellClaudia EatonCarlos F. Mendes de LeonKathleen L. GradyWilliam H. PearceKristin J. Flynnİmke Janssen
- Topics
- Heart Failure Treatment and Management (5 papers)Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (3 papers)Peripheral Artery Disease Management (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Family PracticeCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Cheryl Rucker‐Whitaker
10 papers receiving 501 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 221
- Surgery 145
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 100
- General Health Professions 82
- Family Practice 75
Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl Rucker‐Whitaker
This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Rucker‐Whitaker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Rucker‐Whitaker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Rucker‐Whitaker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl Rucker‐Whitaker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Rucker‐Whitaker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Rucker‐Whitaker. The network helps show where Cheryl Rucker‐Whitaker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheryl Rucker‐Whitaker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheryl Rucker‐Whitaker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheryl Rucker‐Whitaker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cheryl Rucker‐Whitaker. Cheryl Rucker‐Whitaker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 142 | |
| 2 | 57 | |
| 3 | 33 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | A pilot study of self-management in African Americans with common chronic conditions. | 8 |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 87 | |
| 9 | 45 | |
| 10 | 67 |
About Cheryl Rucker‐Whitaker
Cheryl Rucker‐Whitaker is a scholar working on Family Practice, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 10 papers that have together received 509 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heart Failure Treatment and Management (5 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (3 papers) and Peripheral Artery Disease Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (75 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (221 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (100 citations). Cheryl Rucker‐Whitaker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James E. Calvin, Lynda H. Powell, Claudia Eaton, Carlos F. Mendes de Leon, Kathleen L. Grady, William H. Pearce, Kristin J. Flynn, İmke Janssen, Walter J. McCarthy and Joe Feinglass. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.