G. Hauser

606 total citations
11 papers, 557 citations indexed

About

G. Hauser is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, G. Hauser has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 557 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 8 papers in Radiation and 2 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in G. Hauser's work include Nuclear physics research studies (8 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (7 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (3 papers). G. Hauser is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (8 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (7 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (3 papers). G. Hauser collaborates with scholars based in Germany. G. Hauser's co-authors include H. Rebel, G.W. Schweimer, R. Löhken, G. Schatz, Janet Specht, D. Habs, H. Klewe‐Nebenius, G. Nowicki, D. Hartmann and W. Wiesner and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B and Nuclear Physics A.

In The Last Decade

G. Hauser

11 papers receiving 530 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
G. Hauser Germany	9	516	221	206	49	44	11	557
R. Löhken Germany	13	627 1.2×	268 1.2×	276 1.3×	56 1.1×	49 1.1×	22	688
W.S. Gray United States	11	424 0.8×	192 0.9×	205 1.0×	42 0.9×	35 0.8×	20	456
L. Becker Switzerland	7	373 0.7×	172 0.8×	172 0.8×	20 0.4×	28 0.6×	20	434
S.D. Hoath United Kingdom	16	424 0.8×	228 1.0×	155 0.8×	40 0.8×	35 0.8×	30	541
A. Scott United States	13	485 0.9×	231 1.0×	175 0.8×	64 1.3×	30 0.7×	24	529
W.D. Simpson United States	12	474 0.9×	165 0.7×	201 1.0×	55 1.1×	27 0.6×	20	558
R. A. Eisenstein United States	15	511 1.0×	234 1.1×	140 0.7×	56 1.1×	32 0.7×	25	583
D.W. Banes United Kingdom	13	437 0.8×	252 1.1×	169 0.8×	40 0.8×	29 0.7×	19	461
J. Kokame Japan	14	379 0.7×	213 1.0×	170 0.8×	40 0.8×	32 0.7×	22	428
M. Hyakutake Japan	13	431 0.8×	169 0.8×	258 1.3×	45 0.9×	62 1.4×	49	536

Countries citing papers authored by G. Hauser

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Hauser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Hauser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Hauser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Hauser

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Hauser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Hauser. The network helps show where G. Hauser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Hauser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Hauser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Hauser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Hauser. G. Hauser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Rebel, H., G. Hauser, G.W. Schweimer, et al.. (1974). The deformation of 46, 48, 50Ti from 104 MeV α-particle scattering. Nuclear Physics A. 218(1). 13–42. 59 indexed citations

2.

Schweimer, G.W., H. Rebel, G. Nowicki, G. Hauser, & R. Löhken. (1972). Evidence for prolate shape of 32S from 104 MeV α-particle scattering. Physics Letters B. 39(5). 627–628. 11 indexed citations

3.

Hauser, G., R. Löhken, G. Nowicki, et al.. (1972). (α, τ) and (α, t) reactions with 104 MeV α-particles. Nuclear Physics A. 182(1). 1–19. 35 indexed citations

4.

Rebel, H., G.W. Schweimer, G. Schatz, et al.. (1972). Quadrupole and hexadecapole deformation of 2s-1d shell nuclei. Nuclear Physics A. 182(1). 145–173. 152 indexed citations

5.

Rebel, H., R. Löhken, G.W. Schweimer, G. Schatz, & G. Hauser. (1972). Elastische und inelastische Streuung von 104 MeV Alpha-Teilchen an58,60,62,64Ni. Zeitschrift für Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei. 256(3). 258–290. 59 indexed citations

6.

Specht, Janet, G.W. Schweimer, H. Rebel, et al.. (1971). Evidence for oblate shape of 12C from inelastic α-particle scattering. Nuclear Physics A. 171(1). 65–72. 32 indexed citations

7.

Hauser, G., R. Löhken, G. Nowicki, et al.. (1971). Experimental determination of the normalization factors for (α, τ) and (α, t) reactions. Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento. 2(8). 405–408. 3 indexed citations

8.

Rebel, H., G.W. Schweimer, Janet Specht, et al.. (1971). Hexadecapole Moments ofNe20andSi28from Scattering of 104-MeVαParticles. Physical Review Letters. 26(19). 1190–1194. 40 indexed citations

9.

Specht, Janet, H. Rebel, G. Schatz, et al.. (1970). Inelastic scattering of 104 MeV α-particles on 12C, 20Ne and 64Ni. Nuclear Physics A. 143(2). 373–384. 17 indexed citations

10.

Hauser, G., R. Löhken, H. Rebel, et al.. (1969). Elastic scattering of 104 MeV alpha particles. Nuclear Physics A. 128(1). 81–109. 143 indexed citations

11.

Hauser, G., et al.. (1968). Elastic scattering of 104 MeV alpha particles. Physics Letters B. 27(4). 220–222. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact