Janet Shapiro

1.4k citations
60 papers · 998 indexed · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Janet Shapiro

58 papers receiving 945 citations

Peers

Janet Shapiro
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Hepatology 223
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 129
  • Internal Medicine 63
  • Emergency Medical Services 88
  • Emergency Medicine 119
Replace Abdulaziz Al‐Dawood with:
Abdulaziz Al‐Dawood Saudi Arabia
Carlos Alzola United States
J. Mark FitzGerald Canada
John Matelski Canada
Markus Wehler Germany
Saqib I. Dara United States
Daliana Peres Bota Belgium
Marilyn G. Foreman United States
Sunjae Bae United States
Júlia Tizue Fukushima Brazil
Janet Shapiro relative to Abdulaziz Al‐Dawood Saudi Arabia Abdulaziz Al‐Dawood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Abdulaziz Al‐Dawood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Shapiro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Shapiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Shapiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Shapiro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Shapiro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Shapiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Shapiro. The network helps show where Janet Shapiro may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet Shapiro, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet Shapiro Line = papers co-authored together Janet Shapiro links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201713
2 201431
3 20112
4 201011
5 20089
6 20076
7 200620
8 20062
9 20049
10 20021
11 200213
12 200015
13 1997104
14 19951
15 199416
16 19927
17 199017
18 199045
19
Employer perspectives on the preferred provider organization concept.
19844
20 1979237

About Janet Shapiro

Janet Shapiro is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Internal Medicine, Microbiology, Emergency Medical Services and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 60 papers that have together received 998 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (9 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (7 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (7 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (6 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (5 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (5 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (4 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (223 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (129 citations), Internal Medicine (63 citations), Emergency Medical Services (88 citations) and Emergency Medicine (119 citations). Janet Shapiro has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Hamilton Smith, Fenton Schaffner, Miguel Ángel Suárez, John E. Kralewski, Roger Feldman, Hassan Khouli, Edward Eden, Bryan Dowd, Dany Elsayegh and Adil Shujaat. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, CHEST Journal, Critical Care Medicine, Anesthesiology and Health Care Management Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026