Janet M. Meredith

25 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Janet M. Meredith
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Virology 101
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 451
  • Insect Science 239
  • Infectious Diseases 327
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 102
Replace Kyle L. Johnson with:
Kyle L. Johnson United States
Matthias Liniger Switzerland
Arabinda Nayak United States
Valeria Lulla United Kingdom
Ulrike Boege Canada
Andrew Varble United States
Jelke Jan Fros Netherlands
Joost Haasnoot Netherlands
Lisa O. Roberts United Kingdom
Andrei N. Varnavski Australia
Janet M. Meredith relative to Kyle L. Johnson United States Kyle L. Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Kyle L. Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet M. Meredith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet M. Meredith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet M. Meredith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet M. Meredith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet M. Meredith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet M. Meredith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet M. Meredith. The network helps show where Janet M. Meredith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet M. Meredith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet M. Meredith Line = papers co-authored together Janet M. Meredith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000213
2 1989202
3 2006131
4 201187
5 200675
6 200561
7 199560
8 200342
9 201337
10 199835
11 201427
12 198923
13 199923
14 200622
15 200618
16 200817
17
Live-attenuated strains of improved genetic stability.
200114
18 200911
19 201411
20 20139

About Janet M. Meredith

Janet M. Meredith is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Insect Science, Agronomy and Crop Science, Infectious Diseases and Molecular Biology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Viral Infections and Immunology Research (11 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (7 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (6 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (6 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (5 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (5 papers), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (4 papers) and Plant Virus Research Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (101 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (451 citations), Insect Science (239 citations), Infectious Diseases (327 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (102 citations). Janet M. Meredith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey W. Almond, Paul Eggleston, David John Evans, Derric David Nimmo, Luke Alphey, Yasmin Chaudhry, Andrew J. Richardson, Ian Goodfellow, William Barclay and Philip David Minor. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Virology, Insect Molecular Biology, PLoS ONE, Journal of General Virology and Theriogenology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact