Janet Erro
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 0.5%
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Daniel C. CherkinKaren J. ShermanRichard A. DeyoDiana L. MigliorettiKristin DelaneyAndrew L. AvinsWilliam E. BarlowDavid M. Eisenberg
- Topics
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (11 papers)Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (6 papers)Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers)
- Journals
- Annals of Internal MedicineJournal of the American Geriatrics SocietyClinical Journal of Pain
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Janet Erro
12 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Complementary and alternative medicine 628
- Pharmacology 529
- Cognitive Neuroscience 295
- Psychiatry and Mental health 170
- Clinical Psychology 162
Countries citing papers authored by Janet Erro
This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Erro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Erro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Erro more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Erro
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Erro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Erro. The network helps show where Janet Erro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Erro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Erro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Erro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Erro. Janet Erro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Summaries for patients a comparison of massage therapy and usual medical care for chronic low back pain | 1 |
| 2 | 97 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 328 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | A method for describing and evaluating naturopathic whole practice. | 15 |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 370 | |
| 11 | 107 | |
| 12 | 43 |
About Janet Erro
Janet Erro is a scholar working on Complementary and Manual Therapy, Complementary and alternative medicine and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (11 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (6 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (628 citations), Pharmacology (529 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (295 citations). Janet Erro has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Daniel C. Cherkin, Karen J. Sherman, Richard A. Deyo, Diana L. Miglioretti, Kristin Delaney, Andrew L. Avins, William E. Barlow, David M. Eisenberg, Rene Hawkes and Partap S. Khalsa. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and Clinical Journal of Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.