Debbie Rhea

131 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Debbie Rhea
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 525
  • Pharmacy 110
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 288
  • Clinical Psychology 291
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 366
Replace Briony Hill with:
Briony Hill Australia
Raquel Costa Portugal
Yaser Adi United Kingdom
Melanie Hayman Australia
Susan Evers Canada
Jens Henrichs Netherlands
Anca Gaston Canada
Deborah J. Aaron United States
Fiorella Monti Italy
Jane S Thornton Canada
Debbie Rhea relative to Briony Hill Australia Briony Hill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Briony Hill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Debbie Rhea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debbie Rhea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debbie Rhea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debbie Rhea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debbie Rhea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debbie Rhea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debbie Rhea. The network helps show where Debbie Rhea may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Debbie Rhea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Debbie Rhea Line = papers co-authored together Debbie Rhea links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 132 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200794
2 200779
3
Development of the Muscle Dysmorphia Inventory (MDI).
200470
4 200664
5 201460
6 200558
7 201153
8 200251
9 200849
10 201242
11 201140
12 199939
13 200435
14 201033
15 200832
16 200832
17 200831
18 200529
19 200528
20 200628

About Debbie Rhea

Debbie Rhea is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 132 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (39 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (19 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (17 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (12 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (11 papers), Children's Physical and Motor Development (10 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (9 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (525 citations), Pharmacy (110 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (288 citations), Clinical Psychology (291 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (366 citations). Debbie Rhea has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Malta. Frequent co-authors include Niki Istwan, Gary Stanziano, Christopher D. Lantz, Cheryl Desch, Allen E. Cornelius, Andrei Rebarber, Scott B. Martin, Víctor Hugo González-Quintero, Daniel H. Saltzman and Christy Greenleaf. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Journal of Perinatology, Journal of Perinatal Medicine, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine and Journal of Perinatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact