Jane Veys

424 citations
9 papers · 312 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Veys

9 papers receiving 286 citations

Peers

Jane Veys
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Ophthalmology 95
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 246
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 130
  • Dermatology 41
  • Immunology and Allergy 25
Replace Michael Read with:
Michael Read United Kingdom
J.R. Larke United Kingdom
Peter Bergenske United States
Holly Lorentz Canada
Cheryl Skotnitsky Australia
Renée Garofalo United States
Yuri Sakane Japan
Ralph Stone United States
Rachael C. Peterson United Kingdom
Ewen King-Smith United States
Jane Veys relative to Michael Read United Kingdom Michael Read's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Michael Read · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Veys

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Veys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Veys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Veys more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Veys

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Veys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Veys. The network helps show where Jane Veys may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Jane Veys, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Veys Line = papers co-authored together Jane Veys links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2002198
2 198751
3 200327
4 199218
5
Defects in disposable contact lenses can compromise ocular integrity
19928
6 20095
7 20173
8
Clinical evaluation of microfenestrated contact lenses
19931
9
[Subjective assessment of results obtained with two silicon-hydrogel contact lenses].
20061

About Jane Veys

Jane Veys is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Dermatology and Cultural Studies, having authored 9 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (8 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (1 paper), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (1 paper), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (1 paper) and Tattoo and Body Piercing Complications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (95 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (246 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (130 citations), Dermatology (41 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (25 citations). Jane Veys has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Coleman, Graeme P. Young, Nicola Pritchard, R. Mévrel, Nathan Efron, Cristina M. Schnider, Ian Davies, Anna Sulley and Kathryn Dumbleton. Their work appears in journals such as Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, International Contact Lens Clinic, Materials Science and Engineering and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact