Rachael C. Peterson

578 total citations
18 papers, 429 citations indexed

About

Rachael C. Peterson is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachael C. Peterson has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 429 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 11 papers in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in Rachael C. Peterson's work include Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (12 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (8 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (6 papers). Rachael C. Peterson is often cited by papers focused on Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (12 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (8 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (6 papers). Rachael C. Peterson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Brazil. Rachael C. Peterson's co-authors include James S. Wolffsohn, Craig A. Woods, Desmond Fonn, Lynn Winterton, John Lally, Colin Fowler, John B. Lowe, Luigina Sorbara, Martin Rubinstein and Lyndon Jones and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Ophthalmology, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Rachael C. Peterson

18 papers receiving 415 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rachael C. Peterson United Kingdom 12 289 203 203 71 47 18 429
Michael Read United Kingdom 10 256 0.9× 96 0.5× 121 0.6× 34 0.5× 32 0.7× 24 347
Jennie Diec Australia 13 433 1.5× 228 1.1× 333 1.6× 211 3.0× 27 0.6× 31 527
Fabrizio Zeri Italy 12 219 0.8× 176 0.9× 202 1.0× 164 2.3× 25 0.5× 58 458
D. Fonn Canada 10 319 1.1× 217 1.1× 261 1.3× 92 1.3× 44 0.9× 25 426
Yuta Shigeno Japan 9 215 0.7× 151 0.7× 134 0.7× 44 0.6× 50 1.1× 12 293
Julia C. Mainstone Australia 6 367 1.3× 272 1.3× 228 1.1× 80 1.1× 48 1.0× 8 475
Renée Garofalo United States 10 312 1.1× 132 0.7× 223 1.1× 30 0.4× 27 0.6× 25 362
Olivia L Lee United States 12 298 1.0× 287 1.4× 267 1.3× 28 0.4× 34 0.7× 26 523
Jami Kern United States 12 608 2.1× 291 1.4× 338 1.7× 108 1.5× 105 2.2× 27 665
José‐María Sánchez‐González Spain 15 334 1.2× 346 1.7× 425 2.1× 187 2.6× 55 1.2× 103 710

Countries citing papers authored by Rachael C. Peterson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachael C. Peterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachael C. Peterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachael C. Peterson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachael C. Peterson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachael C. Peterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachael C. Peterson. The network helps show where Rachael C. Peterson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachael C. Peterson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachael C. Peterson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachael C. Peterson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachael C. Peterson. Rachael C. Peterson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
McCabe, Cathleen M., et al.. (2024). Impact of Aspheric Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation on Uncorrected Intermediate Visual Acuity: a Combined Analysis. Clinical ophthalmology. Volume 18. 1491–1501. 2 indexed citations
2.
Nuijts, Rudy M.M.A., Uday Bhatt, Mayank A. Nanavaty, et al.. (2023). Three-year multinational clinical study on an aspheric hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 49(7). 672–678. 10 indexed citations
3.
Sorbara, Luigina, et al.. (2014). Comparison between Live and Photographed Slit Lamp Grading of Corneal Staining. Optometry and Vision Science. 92(3). 312–317. 11 indexed citations
4.
Morgan, Philip B., Frank V. Bright, Susan E. Burke, et al.. (2013). 4. Contemporary research in contact lens care. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 36. S22–S27. 4 indexed citations
5.
Gorbet, Maud, Rachael C. Peterson, David J. McCanna, et al.. (2013). Human Corneal Epithelial Cell Shedding and Fluorescein Staining in Response to Silicone Hydrogel Lenses and Contact Lens Disinfecting Solutions. Current Eye Research. 39(3). 245–256. 17 indexed citations
6.
Luensmann, Doerte, Amir Moezzi, Rachael C. Peterson, Craig A. Woods, & Desmond Fonn. (2012). Corneal Staining and Cell Shedding during the Development of Solution-Induced Corneal Staining. Optometry and Vision Science. 89(6). 868–874. 7 indexed citations
7.
Tilia, Daniel, et al.. (2012). Can contact lens wearers improve comfort by changing contact lens products?. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 35. e26–e26. 1 indexed citations
8.
Peterson, Rachael C., et al.. (2011). Non-Invasive Collection and Examination of Human Corneal Epithelial Cells. Optometry and Vision Science. 88(11). 1317–1325. 9 indexed citations
9.
Fonn, Desmond, Rachael C. Peterson, & Craig A. Woods. (2010). Corneal Staining as a Response to Contact Lens Wear. Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice. 36(5). 318–321. 21 indexed citations
10.
Peterson, Rachael C., Desmond Fonn, Craig A. Woods, & Lyndon Jones. (2010). Impact of a Rub and Rinse on Solution-Induced Corneal Staining. Optometry and Vision Science. 87(12). 1030–1036. 18 indexed citations
11.
Peterson, Rachael C. & James S. Wolffsohn. (2009). Objective Grading of The Anterior Eye. Optometry and Vision Science. 86(3). 273–278. 53 indexed citations
12.
Sorbara, Luigina, Rachael C. Peterson, Craig A. Woods, & Desmond Fonn. (2009). Multipurpose Disinfecting Solutions and Their Interactions With a Silicone Hydrogel Lens. Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice. 35(2). 92–97. 34 indexed citations
13.
Peterson, Rachael C., James S. Wolffsohn, & Colin Fowler. (2006). Optimization of Anterior Eye Fluorescein Viewing. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 142(4). 572–575.e2. 42 indexed citations
14.
Wolffsohn, James S. & Rachael C. Peterson. (2006). Anterior ophthalmic imaging. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 89(4). 205–214. 13 indexed citations
15.
Peterson, Rachael C., et al.. (2006). Clinical performance of daily disposable soft contact lenses using sustained release technology. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 29(3). 127–134. 92 indexed citations
16.
Peterson, Rachael C.. (2005). The effect of digital image resolution and compression on anterior eye imaging. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 89(7). 828–830. 16 indexed citations
17.
Wolffsohn, James S. & Rachael C. Peterson. (2003). A review of current knowledge on Electronic Vision Enhancement Systems for the visually impaired. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 23(1). 35–42. 37 indexed citations
18.
Peterson, Rachael C., James S. Wolffsohn, Martin Rubinstein, & John B. Lowe. (2003). Benefits of electronic vision enhancement systems (EVES) for the visually impaired. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 136(6). 1129–1135. 42 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michael Read Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennie Diec Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Fabrizio Zeri Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by D. Fonn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Yuta Shigeno Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Julia C. Mainstone Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Renée Garofalo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Olivia L Lee Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jami Kern Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by José‐María Sánchez‐González
Rankless by CCL
2026