Jane Thomson
About
In The Last Decade
Jane Thomson
3 papers receiving 116 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Surgery 55
- Gastroenterology 36
- Neurology 27
- Cancer Research 24
- Physiology 23
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Thomson
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Thomson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Thomson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Thomson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Thomson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Thomson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Thomson. The network helps show where Jane Thomson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Thomson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Thomson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Thomson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Thomson. Jane Thomson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Validation of corrections for errors in collimation during measurement of gastric emptying of nuclide-labeled meals. | 20 |
| 2 | Error and corrections with scintigraphic measurement of gastric emptying of solid foods. | 98 |
| 3 | 2 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.