Countries where authors publish in Clinical Nuclear Medicine
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Nuclear Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Nuclear Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Nuclear Medicine more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Clinical Nuclear Medicine
This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Nuclear Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Nuclear Medicine.
About Clinical Nuclear Medicine
The 13.9k papers published in Clinical Nuclear Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 106.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Clinical Nuclear Medicine usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (6.1k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (3.5k papers) and Surgery (4.7k papers) specifically the topics of Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (3.3k papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (1.6k papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (1.5k papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (798 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (712 papers), Bone health and treatments (618 papers), Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (586 papers) and Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (584 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Nuclear Medicine are Herbert Malamud, Gerard W. Moskowitz, Abass Alavi, Hongming Zhuang, Roland Bramlet, Ba D. Nguyen, John B. Selby, Jay A. Harolds, Gary F. Gates and Donald A. Meier.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.