Jane Im

476 total citations
15 papers, 234 citations indexed

About

Jane Im is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Im has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 234 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Communication and 5 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Jane Im's work include Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (6 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (5 papers) and Social Media and Politics (3 papers). Jane Im is often cited by papers focused on Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (6 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (5 papers) and Social Media and Politics (3 papers). Jane Im collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. Jane Im's co-authors include Éric Gilbert, Jill Dimond, Una Lee, Mark S. Ackerman, Colleen M. Seifert, Eytan Adar, Hariharan Subramonyam, Eshwar Chandrasekharan, David R. Karger and Nikola Banović and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Applied Clinical Informatics and CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

In The Last Decade

Jane Im

13 papers receiving 227 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Im United States 9 98 84 60 43 38 15 234
Ashwaq Alsoubai United States 9 138 1.4× 61 0.7× 51 0.8× 18 0.4× 41 1.1× 24 262
Daniel Delmonaco United States 7 131 1.3× 134 1.6× 109 1.8× 31 0.7× 22 0.6× 12 267
Tony Wang United States 4 108 1.1× 137 1.6× 115 1.9× 12 0.3× 18 0.5× 8 254
Allison McDonald United States 10 166 1.7× 74 0.9× 38 0.6× 15 0.3× 53 1.4× 21 351
Yuting Liao United States 10 132 1.3× 42 0.5× 33 0.6× 12 0.3× 37 1.0× 22 233
Kate Raynes–Goldie Australia 5 243 2.5× 40 0.5× 117 1.9× 11 0.3× 23 0.6× 5 289
Travis L. Wagner United States 8 76 0.8× 28 0.3× 56 0.9× 17 0.4× 8 0.2× 42 223
Rosanna Bellini United Kingdom 11 118 1.2× 17 0.2× 17 0.3× 21 0.5× 97 2.6× 23 246
Susan Leavy Ireland 5 54 0.6× 84 1.0× 14 0.2× 77 1.8× 21 0.6× 18 226
Chandell Gosse Canada 7 133 1.4× 71 0.8× 74 1.2× 11 0.3× 5 0.1× 18 252

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Im

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Im's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Im with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Im more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Im

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Im. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Im. The network helps show where Jane Im may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Im

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Im. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Im based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Im. Jane Im is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Im, Jane, et al.. (2024). User-Centric Textual Descriptions of Privacy-Enhancing Technologies for Ad Tracking and Analytics. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. 2025(1). 379–398. 1 indexed citations
3.
Atreja, Shubham, Jane Im, Paul Resnick, & Libby Hemphill. (2024). AppealMod: Inducing Friction to Reduce Moderator Workload of Handling User Appeals. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 8(CSCW1). 1–35.
4.
Im, Jane, et al.. (2024). Misalignments and Demographic Differences in Expected and Actual Privacy Settings on Facebook. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. 2025(1). 456–471.
7.
Resnick, Paul, et al.. (2023). Searching for or reviewing evidence improves crowdworkers’ misinformation judgments and reduces partisan bias. 2(2). 2502884534–2502884534. 9 indexed citations
8.
Im, Jane, et al.. (2023). Wisdom of Two Crowds: Misinformation Moderation on Reddit and How to Improve this Process---A Case Study of COVID-19. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 7(CSCW1). 1–33. 16 indexed citations
9.
Huang, Yungui, et al.. (2022). Associations of Telehealth Care Delivery with Pediatric Health Care Provider Well-Being. Applied Clinical Informatics. 13(1). 230–241. 15 indexed citations
10.
Im, Jane, et al.. (2022). Women's Perspectives on Harm and Justice after Online Harassment. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 6(CSCW2). 1–23. 29 indexed citations
11.
Zytko, Douglas, et al.. (2022). Consent: A Research and Design Lens for Human-Computer Interaction. 205–208. 6 indexed citations
12.
Subramonyam, Hariharan, Jane Im, Colleen M. Seifert, & Eytan Adar. (2022). Solving Separation-of-Concerns Problems in Collaborative Design of Human-AI Systems through Leaky Abstractions. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–21. 32 indexed citations
14.
15.
Im, Jane, et al.. (2018). Deliberation and Resolution on Wikipedia. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 2(CSCW). 1–24. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026