Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Region Filling and Object Removal by Exemplar-Based Image Inpainting
Countries citing papers authored by Kentaro Toyama
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Kentaro Toyama's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kentaro Toyama with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kentaro Toyama more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kentaro Toyama. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kentaro Toyama. The network helps show where Kentaro Toyama may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kentaro Toyama
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kentaro Toyama.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kentaro Toyama based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kentaro Toyama. Kentaro Toyama is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Toyama, Kentaro. (2014). Development Without Representation. Information Technologies and International Development. 10(4). 49–52.1 indexed citations
7.
Medhi, Indrani, et al.. (2012). Correlation Between Limited Education and Transfer of Learning. Information Technologies and International Development. 8(2). 51–65.12 indexed citations
8.
Toyama, Kentaro, et al.. (2010). Remembering the Past for Meaningful AI-D.. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.3 indexed citations
9.
Unwin, Tim, Dorothea Kleine, & Kentaro Toyama. (2010). Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development.38 indexed citations
Burrell, Jenna & Kentaro Toyama. (2009). What Constitutes Good ICTD Research. Information Technologies and International Development. 5(3). 82–94.77 indexed citations
Winters, Niall & Kentaro Toyama. (2009). Human-Computer Interaction for Development: Mapping the Terrain. Information Technologies and International Development. 5(4).8 indexed citations
14.
Menon, Geeta, et al.. (2008). Challenges of Computerized Job-Search in the Developing World. Human Factors in Computing Systems.2 indexed citations
15.
Toyama, Kentaro, Lakshminarayanan Subramanian, & Muneeb Ali. (2008). Proceedings of the second ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Networked systems for developing regions.2 indexed citations
16.
Gemmell, Jim, C. Lawrence Zitnick, Kentaro Toyama, & Steven M. Seitz. (2000). Gaze-awareness for Videoconferencing: A Software Approach. IEEE Multimedia.25 indexed citations
Toyama, Kentaro & Eric Horvitz. (1999). Bayesian Modality Fusion: Probabilistic Integration of Multiple Vision Algorithms for Head Tracking.49 indexed citations
19.
Toyama, Kentaro, John Krumm, Barry Brumitt, & Brian Meyers. (1999). Wallflower: principles and practice of background maintenance. 255–261 vol.1.1221 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.