David Bright
Impact in
-
- Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
- Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Toxicology top 5%
Papers in
-
- Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance 34
- Crime Patterns and Interventions 30
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 8
- Canadian Identity and History 6
- Co-authors
- Jane Goodman‐DelahuntyCharles P. PollakJenny ChalmersCaitlin HughesCarlo MorselliAlison RitterSergei V. LevchikCatherine Greenhill
- Journals
- Social Networks (7 papers)Global Crime (6 papers)Drug and Alcohol Review (5 papers)Psychiatry Psychology and Law (5 papers)Labour / Le Travail (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
David Bright
83 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
- Sociology and Political Science 786
- Toxicology 49
- Polymers and Plastics 156
- Epidemiology 346
- Clinical Psychology 200
Countries citing papers authored by David Bright
This map shows the geographic impact of David Bright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Bright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Bright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Bright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Bright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Bright. The network helps show where David Bright may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Bright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 6 | Pharmacist Consult Reports to Support Pharmacogenomics Report Interpretation | 2020 | 3 |
| 7 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 75 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 37 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 28 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 16 | Searching for acceptance | 1994 | 2 |
| 17 | 1989 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1989 | 12 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 11 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 147 |
About David Bright
David Bright is a scholar working on Toxicology, Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology, Public Administration and General Decision Sciences, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (34 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (30 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (21 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (9 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (8 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (7 papers), Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (7 papers) and Canadian Identity and History (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (786 citations), Toxicology (49 citations), Polymers and Plastics (156 citations), Epidemiology (346 citations) and Clinical Psychology (200 citations). David Bright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jane Goodman‐Delahunty, Charles P. Pollak, Jenny Chalmers, Caitlin Hughes, Carlo Morselli, Alison Ritter, Sergei V. Levchik, Catherine Greenhill, Chad Whelan and Johan Koskinen. Their work appears in journals such as Social Networks, Global Crime, Drug and Alcohol Review, Psychiatry Psychology and Law and Labour / Le Travail.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.