Jane E. Smith

2.7k citations
46 papers · 1.8k indexed · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Jane E. Smith

46 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Jane E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Insect Science 938
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 477
  • Plant Science 1.3k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 431
  • Soil Science 203
Replace Michael P. Amaranthus with:
Michael P. Amaranthus United States
Carsten Renker Germany
Petr Kohout Czechia
Peggy A. Schultz United States
Paul Widden Canada
Benjamin A. Sikes United States
Sergei Põlme Estonia
Gavin Kernaghan Canada
J. N. Gemma United States
Teele Jairus Estonia
Jane E. Smith relative to Michael P. Amaranthus United States Michael P. Amaranthus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Michael P. Amaranthus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane E. Smith. The network helps show where Jane E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Jane E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009286
2 2002169
3 200491
4 199488
5 199788
6 200572
7 200072
8 199968
9 200964
10 200463
11 201660
12 200350
13 200948
14 199545
15 201140
16 199835
17 200035
18 199734
19 199531
20 201131

About Jane E. Smith

Jane E. Smith is a scholar working on Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Soil Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (26 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (21 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (8 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (7 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (6 papers) and Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (938 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (477 citations), Plant Science (1.3k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (431 citations) and Soil Science (203 citations). Jane E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Randy Molina, Donaraye McKay, Daniel L. Luoma, Nancy S. Weber, David A. Perry, Hugues B. Massicotte, Frank Menzel, Manuela Huso, Suzanne W. Simard and Joseph W. Spatafora. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Mycorrhiza, New Phytologist, Plant and Soil and Canadian Journal of Forest Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026