Jane E. Booth

21 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers

Jane E. Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 197
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 88
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 129
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 76
  • Clinical Psychology 120
Replace James B. Hoelzle with:
James B. Hoelzle United States
Geoffrey Thorley United Kingdom
Abbey R. Roach United States
Mark Ardern United Kingdom
Laiene Olabarrieta‐Landa Spain
Miguel Catalá Spain
Mustafa Baştürk Türkiye
Leonardo Sacco Switzerland
Donald R. Miklich United States
Vesna Radojevic United States
Jane E. Booth relative to James B. Hoelzle United States James B. Hoelzle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
James B. Hoelzle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane E. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane E. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane E. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane E. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane E. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane E. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane E. Booth. The network helps show where Jane E. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane E. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane E. Booth Line = papers co-authored together Jane E. Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200279
2 200670
3 200756
4 201345
5 199941
6 202133
7 202132
8 200530
9 201215
10 202012
11 20239
12 20016
13 20235
14 20205
15 20215
16 19804
17
Legal issues facing the non-traditional family
19943
18 20213
19 19993
20 20252

About Jane E. Booth

Jane E. Booth is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (5 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (3 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (2 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers) and Muscle metabolism and nutrition (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (197 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (88 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (129 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (76 citations) and Clinical Psychology (120 citations). Jane E. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Caryn L. Carlson, Will H. Canu, Don M. Tucker, Jamie L. Benham, Ronald J. Sigal, James A. Mortimer, Amy R. Borenstein, John A. Schinka, Lisa M. Brown and Doreen M. Rabi. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Diabetes, Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, Clinical Endocrinology, Journal of Learning Disabilities and Diabetes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact