Jane Crowe

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
14 papers, 557 citations indexed

About

Jane Crowe is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Crowe has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 557 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 5 papers in Oncology and 5 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Jane Crowe's work include Influenza Virus Research Studies (3 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers). Jane Crowe is often cited by papers focused on Influenza Virus Research Studies (3 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers). Jane Crowe collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Jane Crowe's co-authors include Addie Wootten, Helen Crowe, Anthony J. Costello, Patrick Bowden, Brindha Pillay, Niall M. Corcoran, Ben Tran, Thi H. O. Nguyen, Marios Koutsakos and Liyen Loh and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, European Respiratory Journal and PLoS Pathogens.

In The Last Decade

Jane Crowe

11 papers receiving 549 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: A systematic review of the literature

2015 422 citations Brindha Pillay, Addie Wootten et al. Cancer Treatment Reviews profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jane Crowe Australia	7	208	167	104	99	93	14	557
Laura H. Hendrix United States	15	313 1.5×	273 1.6×	92 0.9×	108 1.1×	78 0.8×	39	733
Robert J. Ignoffo United States	14	390 1.9×	217 1.3×	95 0.9×	93 0.9×	65 0.7×	33	1.0k
Richard Simcock United Kingdom	12	298 1.4×	120 0.7×	67 0.6×	70 0.7×	161 1.7×	43	623
Gavin Li United States	12	264 1.3×	197 1.2×	84 0.8×	134 1.4×	55 0.6×	33	675
Jaclyn Beca Canada	15	284 1.4×	204 1.2×	83 0.8×	61 0.6×	53 0.6×	58	691
Carlotta Buzzoni Italy	15	397 1.9×	213 1.3×	95 0.9×	130 1.3×	35 0.4×	63	817
Maya Marchese United States	17	248 1.2×	245 1.5×	47 0.5×	246 2.5×	47 0.5×	53	799
Jonathan Klein United States	14	199 1.0×	247 1.5×	52 0.5×	215 2.2×	168 1.8×	40	900
Deme Karikios Australia	15	290 1.4×	284 1.7×	54 0.5×	44 0.4×	59 0.6×	50	646
Brindha Pillay Australia	7	253 1.2×	114 0.7×	150 1.4×	106 1.1×	87 0.9×	14	577

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Crowe

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Crowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Crowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Crowe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Crowe

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Crowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Crowe. The network helps show where Jane Crowe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Crowe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Crowe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Crowe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Crowe. Jane Crowe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

Sandt, Carolien E. van de, Malet Aban, Thi H. O. Nguyen, et al.. (2025). Gradual changes within long-lived influenza virus-specific CD8+ T cells are associated with the loss of public TCR clonotypes in older adults. EBioMedicine. 115. 105697–105697.

Crowe, Jane, et al.. (2025). Navigating the shift: New RACGP Red Book guidelines for prostate-specific antigen testing in general practice. Australian Journal of General Practice. 54(12). 909–911.

Manning, Todd, et al.. (2024). Updates in digital shared care: Launching into the 21st century. Australian Journal of General Practice. 53(11). 872–878.

Soo, Wee Kheng, Jane Crowe, Heather Lane, et al.. (2023). Integrated care for older people with cancer: a primary care focus. The Lancet Healthy Longevity. 4(6). e243–e245. 7 indexed citations

Bedi, Pallavi, Kim Turnbull, Andrea Clarke, et al.. (2023). Early Exacerbation Relapse is Increased in Patients with Asthma and Bronchiectasis (a Post hoc Analysis). Lung. 201(1). 17–23. 2 indexed citations

Chastain, Cody A., Cathy A. Jenkins, Daniel B. Moore, et al.. (2022). Non‐targeted hepatitis C virus screening in acute care healthcare settings in the Southern Appalachian region. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(5). e12819–e12819. 2 indexed citations

Bedi, Pallavi, Yang Zhang, Kim Turnbull, et al.. (2021). Feasibility of shortening intravenous antibiotic therapy for bronchiectasis based on bacterial load: a proof-of-concept randomised controlled trial. European Respiratory Journal. 58(6). 2004388–2004388. 12 indexed citations

Lynch, Eleanor W., Jennifer McIntosh, Bogda Koczwara, Jane Crowe, & Jon Emery. (2021). Managing patients receiving new and unfamiliar cancer treatments: A qualitative study of general practitioners’ experience. Australian Journal of General Practice. 50(6). 426–430. 2 indexed citations

Sant, Sneha, Sergio M. Quiñones‐Parra, Marios Koutsakos, et al.. (2020). HLA-B*27:05 alters immunodominance hierarchy of universal influenza-specific CD8+ T cells. PLoS Pathogens. 16(8). e1008714–e1008714. 10 indexed citations

10.

Nguyen, Thi H. O., Sneha Sant, Nicola L. Bird, et al.. (2017). Perturbed CD8+ T cell immunity across universal influenza epitopes in the elderly. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 103(2). 321–339. 43 indexed citations

11.

Pillay, Brindha, Addie Wootten, Helen Crowe, et al.. (2015). The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: A systematic review of the literature. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 42. 56–72. 422 indexed citations breakdown →

12.

Dundee, Philip, Lih‐Ming Wong, Niall M. Corcoran, et al.. (2015). Prostate cancer multidisciplinary care: improving patient outcomes. Trends in Urology & Men s Health. 6(4). 18–20. 1 indexed citations

13.

Murphy, Declan G., Thomas E. Ahlering, William J. Catàlona, et al.. (2013). The M elbourne Consensus Statement on the early detection of prostate cancer. British Journal of Urology. 113(2). 186–188. 50 indexed citations

14.

Crowe, Jane, et al.. (2013). Prostate cancer testing: a snapshot of the attitudes and practice of Australian general practitioners. Australian Journal of Primary Health. 21(1). 111–114. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact