Jane Compson

461 total citations
13 papers, 257 citations indexed

About

Jane Compson is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Compson has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 257 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Clinical Psychology, 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 2 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Jane Compson's work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (5 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (2 papers). Jane Compson is often cited by papers focused on Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (5 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (2 papers). Jane Compson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Jane Compson's co-authors include Mark Graves, Peter D. Hershock, Thomas Arnold and Cyrus P. Olsen and has published in prestigious journals such as Mindfulness, Contemporary Buddhism and Theology and Science.

In The Last Decade

Jane Compson

12 papers receiving 239 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Compson United States 5 227 65 53 49 32 13 257
Anuradha Baminiwatta Sri Lanka 7 194 0.9× 80 1.2× 14 0.3× 44 0.9× 28 0.9× 33 256
Michael Chaskalson United Kingdom 7 314 1.4× 93 1.4× 27 0.5× 78 1.6× 46 1.4× 9 372
Siebrecht Vanhooren Belgium 11 153 0.7× 70 1.1× 54 1.0× 13 0.3× 12 0.4× 27 268
Jennifer Block‐Lerner United States 9 257 1.1× 99 1.5× 14 0.3× 73 1.5× 25 0.8× 17 345
Raluca A. Topciu United States 8 173 0.8× 75 1.2× 29 0.5× 108 2.2× 27 0.8× 11 314
Ashley Kuchar Canada 4 287 1.3× 122 1.9× 15 0.3× 93 1.9× 17 0.5× 7 340
Nicholas K. Canby United States 6 282 1.2× 97 1.5× 16 0.3× 96 2.0× 34 1.1× 11 328
Nicola Hermanto Canada 9 243 1.1× 107 1.6× 16 0.3× 119 2.4× 26 0.8× 11 336
Andre Marquis United States 10 154 0.7× 96 1.5× 40 0.8× 19 0.4× 8 0.3× 26 224
Sarah Strohmaier United Kingdom 7 184 0.8× 55 0.8× 7 0.1× 73 1.5× 26 0.8× 12 269

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Compson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Compson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Compson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Compson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Compson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Compson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Compson. The network helps show where Jane Compson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Compson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Compson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Compson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Compson. Jane Compson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Graves, Mark, et al.. (2024). Compassionate AI and the Alignment Problem. Theology and Science. 22(1). 4–8. 1 indexed citations
2.
Compson, Jane, et al.. (2024). A Middle Path for AI Ethics? Some Buddhist Reflections. Theology and Science. 23(1). 1–5. 1 indexed citations
3.
Graves, Mark & Jane Compson. (2024). Compassionate AI for Moral Decision-Making, Health, and Well-Being. Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society. 7. 520–533. 1 indexed citations
4.
Compson, Jane. (2018). Adverse Meditation Experiences: Navigating Buddhist and Secular Frameworks for Addressing Them. Mindfulness. 9(5). 1358–1369. 27 indexed citations
5.
Compson, Jane. (2017). Cultivating the Contemplative Mind in Cyberspace: field notes from pedagogical experiments in fully online classes.. University of Washington Tacoma Digital Commons (University of Washington Tacoma). 4(1). 1 indexed citations
6.
Compson, Jane, et al.. (2017). Practitioner's Guide to Ethics and Mindfulness-Based Interventions. 17 indexed citations
7.
Compson, Jane. (2015). The CARE heuristic for addressing burnout in nurses. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. 5(7). 3 indexed citations
8.
Compson, Jane, et al.. (2015). Still Exploring the Middle Path: a Response to Commentaries. Mindfulness. 7(2). 548–564. 4 indexed citations
9.
Compson, Jane, et al.. (2015). Bridging the interdisciplinary divide: co-advancing the pedagogy of environmental justice through a digital commons initiative. Interdisciplinary Environmental Review. 16(2/3/4). 158–158. 2 indexed citations
10.
Compson, Jane, et al.. (2014). Traditional and Contemporary Mindfulness: Finding the Middle Path in the Tangle of Concerns. Mindfulness. 6(1). 1–13. 179 indexed citations
12.
Compson, Jane. (2011). A Meeting of Minds in Cyberspace: Eco-contemplative Methods for Online Teaching. University of Washington Tacoma Digital Commons (University of Washington Tacoma). 203–207.
13.
Compson, Jane. (2003). Don Cupitt, Is Nothing Sacred? The Non‐Realistic Philosophy of Religion. University of Washington Tacoma Digital Commons (University of Washington Tacoma). 1(2). 142–157. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026