Jane Compson
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Child Therapy and Development
- Health top 10%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Papers in
-
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions 5
- Resilience and Mental Health 2
- Psychological Treatments and Assessments 1
- Child Therapy and Development 1
-
- Pain Management and Placebo Effect 2
- Co-authors
- Mark Graves (3 shared papers)Thomas Arnold (1 shared paper)Peter D. Hershock (1 shared paper)Cyrus P. Olsen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Mindfulness (3 papers)Theology and Science (2 papers)Contemporary Buddhism (1 paper)Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society (1 paper)Journal of Nursing Education and Practice (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jane Compson
12 papers receiving 239 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Clinical Psychology 227
- Health 53
- Applied Psychology 28
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 49
- Conservation 11
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Compson
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Compson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Compson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Compson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Compson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Compson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Compson. The network helps show where Jane Compson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Jane Compson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 179 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 13 | A Meeting of Minds in Cyberspace: Eco-contemplative Methods for Online Teaching | 2011 | 0 |
About Jane Compson
Jane Compson is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Health, General Health Professions and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 257 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (5 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (2 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (2 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (2 papers), Psychological Treatments and Assessments (1 paper), Child Therapy and Development (1 paper) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (227 citations), Health (53 citations), Applied Psychology (28 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (49 citations) and Conservation (11 citations). Jane Compson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark Graves, Thomas Arnold, Peter D. Hershock and Cyrus P. Olsen. Their work appears in journals such as Mindfulness, Theology and Science, Contemporary Buddhism, Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society and Journal of Nursing Education and Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.