Jan Schreiber

1.4k citations
34 papers · 919 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Jan Schreiber

34 papers receiving 894 citations

Peers

Jan Schreiber
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 305
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 209
  • Computational Mathematics 6
  • Clinical Psychology 177
  • Pharmacy 32
Replace Tricia Z. King with:
Tricia Z. King United States
Thomas J. Eluvathingal United States
Kohei Asano Japan
Christa Watson United States
Leire Zubiaurre‐Elorza Spain
P. Bourgouin Canada
Margaret B. Pulsifer United States
Irit Shapira‐Lichter Israel
Deirdre O’Shea United States
Jennifer J. Kulynych United States
Jan Schreiber relative to Tricia Z. King United States Tricia Z. King's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Tricia Z. King · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Schreiber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Schreiber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Schreiber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Schreiber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Schreiber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Schreiber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Schreiber. The network helps show where Jan Schreiber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan Schreiber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Schreiber Line = papers co-authored together Jan Schreiber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006117
2 2015108
3 201498
4 198492
5 201773
6 201452
7 201640
8 201434
9 201831
10 201427
11 200525
12 199324
13 202022
14
An evaluation of procedures for assessing competency to stand trial.
198720
15 201119
16 202018
17 202117
18 201816
19 202214
20 200712

About Jan Schreiber

Jan Schreiber is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Genetics and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 34 papers that have together received 919 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering (2 papers) and Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (305 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (209 citations), Computational Mathematics (6 citations), Clinical Psychology (177 citations) and Pharmacy (32 citations). Jan Schreiber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ronald Roesch, Stephen L. Golding, Alfred Anwander, Morton Ann Gernsbacher, H. Hill Goldsmith, Carrie L. Arneson, Carol A. Van Hulle, Thomas R. Knösche, Angela D. Friederici and Svenja Caspers. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Nature Communications, Neuro-Oncology, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact