Stephen L. Golding
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Pharmacy top 2%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jennifer L. SkeemRonald RoeschRoger M. KnudsonCaton F. RobertsJan SchreiberAlison SommersLeonard G. RorerRandy Borum
- Topics
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (11 papers)Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (7 papers)Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (6 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyPsychological BulletinJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Stephen L. Golding
42 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Clinical Psychology 727
- Social Psychology 517
- Sociology and Political Science 329
- Pharmacy 110
- Applied Psychology 103
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen L. Golding
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen L. Golding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen L. Golding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen L. Golding more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen L. Golding
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen L. Golding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen L. Golding. The network helps show where Stephen L. Golding may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen L. Golding
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen L. Golding. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen L. Golding based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen L. Golding. Stephen L. Golding is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Criminal Responsibility and the Insanity Defense. | 9 |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 85 | |
| 4 | 49 | |
| 5 | 91 | |
| 6 | Reliability of Criteria-Based Content Analysis* | 2 |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 55 | |
| 12 | An evaluation of procedures for assessing competency to stand trial. | 20 |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 58 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Stephen L. Golding
Stephen L. Golding is a scholar working on Pharmacy, General Decision Sciences and Family Practice, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (11 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (7 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (727 citations), General Decision Sciences (54 citations) and Social Psychology (517 citations). Stephen L. Golding has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer L. Skeem, Ronald Roesch, Roger M. Knudson, Caton F. Roberts, Jan Schreiber, Alison Sommers, Leonard G. Rorer, Randy Borum, Randy K. Otto and Edward Lichtenstein. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychological Bulletin and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.