Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
An Experiment on Risk Taking and Evaluation Periods
1997822 citationsUri Gneezy, Jan PottersThe Quarterly Journal of Economicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Potters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Potters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Potters more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Potters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Potters. The network helps show where Jan Potters may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Potters
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Potters.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Potters based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Potters. Jan Potters is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jiang, Ting, Jan Potters, & Yukihiko Funaki. (2015). Eye‐tracking Social Preferences. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 29(2-3). 157–168.35 indexed citations
9.
Damme, E.E.C. van, et al.. (2010). Hiding an Inconvenient Truth : Lies and Vagueness (Revision of DP 2008-107). Other publications TiSEM.
10.
Heijden, Eline van der, Jan Potters, & Martín Sefton. (2008). Hierarchy, Opportunism in Teams. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).42 indexed citations
Krause, Michael U., Sabine Kröger, & Jan Potters. (2004). Insights from Experimental Economics for Market Regulation. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 217–238.1 indexed citations
Boone, Jan & Jan Potters. (2002). Transparency, Prices and Welfare with Imperfect Substitutes. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.3 indexed citations
16.
Damme, E.E.C. van, et al.. (1998). Universele Dienstverlening, Marktwerking ten Bate van Iedereen. Research portal (Tilburg University).2 indexed citations
17.
Gneezy, Uri & Jan Potters. (1997). An Experiment on Risk Taking and Evaluation Periods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 112(2). 631–645.822 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Potters, Jan & Frans van Winden. (1996). . UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).22 indexed citations
19.
Potters, Jan, et al.. (1996). Bets and bids: favorite-longshot bias and winner's curse. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.