Jan Gottschalk

566 citations
29 papers · 266 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jan Gottschalk

23 papers receiving 215 citations

Peers

Jan Gottschalk
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 178
  • Finance 106
  • Economics and Econometrics 191
  • Development 8
  • General Energy 2
Replace Ingo G. Bordon with:
Ingo G. Bordon Germany
Alberto Botta Italy
Jean-Pierre Allégret France
Luca Fornaro Spain
Constantino Hevia Argentina
Douglas D. Purvis Canada
Kirsten Lommatzsch Germany
Cécile Couharde France
Alberto Bagnai Italy
Blaise Gnimassoun France
Jan Gottschalk relative to Ingo G. Bordon Germany Ingo G. Bordon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Ingo G. Bordon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Gottschalk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Gottschalk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Gottschalk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Gottschalk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Gottschalk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Gottschalk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Gottschalk. The network helps show where Jan Gottschalk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Jan Gottschalk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Gottschalk Line = papers co-authored together Jan Gottschalk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20194
2 20160
3 20163
4 20131
5 20131
6 20101
7 20102
8 201029
9 201035
10
Default in Today's Advanced Economies: Unnecessary, Undesirable, and Unlikely
201010
11 201014
12 20091
13 20084
14
The New Keynesian Model and the Long-run Vertical Phillips Curve: Does it hold for Germany?
20064
15 20054
16
Weltwirtschaft vor dem Ende der Talfahrt
20010
17 200134
18 20003
19
Aufschwung mit geringer Dynamik
19990
20 19990

About Jan Gottschalk

Jan Gottschalk is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance, Development, Economics and Econometrics and Accounting, having authored 29 papers that have together received 266 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Financial Crisis and Policies (9 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (9 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (8 papers), Natural Resources and Economic Development (5 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (4 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (4 papers), International Development and Aid (3 papers) and Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (178 citations), Finance (106 citations), Economics and Econometrics (191 citations), Development (8 citations) and General Energy (2 citations). Jan Gottschalk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Rafael Portillo, Jihad Dagher, Luis‐Felipe Zanna, Andrew Berg, Paolo Mauro, Lorenzo Forni, Carlo Cottarelli, Fabian Bornhorst, Annalisa Fedelino and Laura Jaramillo. Their work appears in journals such as International Finance, Journal of Comparative Economics, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) and Econstor (Econstor).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026