Joost D.E. Haeck
About
Joost D.E. Haeck is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Surgery.
According to data from OpenAlex, Joost D.E. Haeck has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 399 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 23 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 21 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Joost D.E. Haeck's work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (23 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (22 papers) and Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (19 papers). Joost D.E. Haeck is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (23 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (22 papers) and Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (19 papers). Joost D.E. Haeck collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Canada. Joost D.E. Haeck's co-authors include Robbert J. de Winter, Karel T. Koch, Jan van der Meulen, Ken Redekop, José P.S. Henriques, R.T. Krediet, Rudolf W. van Olden, D. G. Struijk, Jan J. Piek and Marije M. Vis and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology and European Heart Journal.
In The Last Decade
Joost D.E. Haeck
27 papers receiving 389 citations
Peers
Joost D.E. Haeck
Masaya Otsuka Japan
Suguru Nishigoori Japan
John Mooney Australia
Daigo Hiraya Japan
Mathias Forkmann Germany
Süleyman Çağan Efe Türkiye
Serena Rakar Italy
Juan Lacalzada‐Almeida Spain
Venkatraman Srinivasan United States
Citations per year, relative to Joost D.E. Haeck Joost D.E. Haeck (= 1×)
peers
Masaya Otsuka
Countries citing papers authored by Joost D.E. Haeck
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Joost D.E. Haeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joost D.E. Haeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joost D.E. Haeck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joost D.E. Haeck
Since
Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joost D.E. Haeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joost D.E. Haeck. The network helps show where Joost D.E. Haeck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joost D.E. Haeck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joost D.E. Haeck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joost D.E. Haeck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joost D.E. Haeck. Joost D.E. Haeck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
1.
Haeck, Joost D.E., Marcel van’t Veer, Frederik M. Zimmermann, et al.. (2021). Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Medical Therapy for Coronary Lesions With Positive Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) but Preserved Pressure-Bounded Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR): A Substudy of the Randomized Compare-Acute Trial. The Journal of invasive cardiology. 33(7).
2.
Triantafyllis, Andreas S., et al.. (2020). Optical coherence tomography guided thrombectomy through a “home-made” aspiration catheter in a young patient with myocardial infarction. To stent or not to stent?. Advances in Interventional Cardiology. 16(4). 486–490.
3.
Triantafyllis, Andreas S., et al.. (2018). Perforation of a Saphenous Vein Graft Anastomosed at a Y-Configuration to the Left Internal Mammary Artery. Cardiovascular revascularization medicine. 20(8). 716–719.
4.
Kuijt, Wichert J., Cindy L. Green, Niels Verouden, et al.. (2017). What is the best ST-segment recovery parameter to predict clinical outcome and myocardial infarct size? Amplitude, speed, and completeness of ST-segment recovery after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Journal of Electrocardiology. 50(6). 952–959.
5.
Haeck, Joost D.E., Jan G.P. Tijssen, Cynthia L. Green, et al.. (2016). Ventricular arrhythmia burst is an independent indicator of larger infarct size even in optimal reperfusion in STEMI. Journal of Electrocardiology. 49(3). 345–352.
6.
Kuijt, Wichert J., Jan G.P. Tijssen, Sebastiaan C.A.M. Bekkers, et al.. (2015). Prospective evaluation of where reperfusion ventricular arrhythmia “bursts” fit into optimal reperfusion in STEMI. International Journal of Cardiology. 195. 136–142.
7.
Remmelink, Maurice, Krischan D. Sjauw, Ze Yie Yong, et al.. (2013). Coronary microcirculatory dysfunction is associated with left ventricular dysfunction during follow-up after STEMI. Netherlands Heart Journal. 21(5). 238–244.
8.
Damman, Peter, Wichert J. Kuijt, Pier Woudstra, et al.. (2012). Multiple biomarkers at admission are associated with angiographic, electrocardiographic, and imaging cardiovascular mechanistic markers of outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. American Heart Journal. 163(5). 783–789.
9.
Laan, Anja M. van der, Alexander Hirsch, Joost D.E. Haeck, et al.. (2011). Recovery of Microcirculation After Intracoronary Infusion of Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells or Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Patients Treated by Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 4(8). 913–920.
10.
Haeck, Joost D.E., Niels Verouden, Wichert J. Kuijt, et al.. (2010). Impact of early, late, and no ST-segment resolution measured by continuous ST Holter monitoring on left ventricular ejection fraction and infarct size as determined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Electrocardiology. 44(1). 36–41.
11.
Verouden, Niels, Joost D.E. Haeck, Wichert J. Kuijt, et al.. (2010). Clinical and Angiographic Predictors of ST-Segment Recovery After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. The American Journal of Cardiology. 105(12). 1692–1697.
12.
Haeck, Joost D.E., Wichert J. Kuijt, Karel T. Koch, et al.. (2010). INFARCT SIZE AND LEFT VENTRICULAR FUNCTION IN THE PROXIMAL EMBOLIC PROTECTION IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION AND RESOLUTION OF ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION (PREPARE) TRIAL: ANCILLARY CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE STUDY. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 55(10). A184.E1725–A184.E1725.
13.
Gu, Youlan L., Joost D.E. Haeck, Mathijs Vogelzang, et al.. (2010). Computer‐assisted quantification of myocardial reperfusion after primary percutaneous coronary intervention predicts functional and contrast‐enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance outcomes in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 77(2). 174–181.
14.
Kuijt, Wichert J., Matthew T. Roe, Cindy L. Green, et al.. (2010). QUANTIFICATION OF AMPLITUDE, SPEED AND COMPLETENESS OF ST-SEGMENT RECOVERY AFTER PRIMARY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION FOR ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: WHAT IS THE “BEST ST” RECOVERY TO PREDICT CLINICAL OUTCOME?. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 55(10). A134.E1255–A134.E1255.
15.
Verouden, Niels, Joost D.E. Haeck, Wichert J. Kuijt, et al.. (2010). Comparison of the Usefulness of N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide to Other Serum Biomarkers as an Early Predictor of ST-Segment Recovery After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. The American Journal of Cardiology. 105(8). 1047–1052.
16.
Verouden, Niels, Joost D.E. Haeck, Karel T. Koch, et al.. (2010). ST‐Segment Resolution Prior to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is a Poor Indicator of Coronary Artery Patency in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology. 15(2). 107–115.
17.
Verouden, Niels, Joost D.E. Haeck, Wichert J. Kuijt, et al.. (2010). Prediction of 1-Year Mortality With Different Measures of ST-Segment Recovery in All-Comers After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 3(5). 522–529.
18.
Hirsch, Alexander, Joost D.E. Haeck, Robin Nijveldt, et al.. (2009). Intracoronary infusion of mononuclear cells from the bone marrow or peripheral blood on the recovery of microvascular function in acute myocardial infarction patients: HEBE Doppler substudy. European Heart Journal. 30. 504–505.
19.
Haeck, Joost D.E., Wichert J. Kuijt, K. T. Koch, et al.. (2009). Infarct size and left ventricular function in the PRoximal Embolic Protection in Acute myocardial infarction and Resolution of ST-segment Elevation (PREPARE) trial: ancillary cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. Heart. 96(3). 190–195.
20.
Haeck, Joost D.E., Karel T. Koch, Luc Bilodeau, et al.. (2009). Randomized Comparison of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Combined Proximal Embolic Protection and Thrombus Aspiration Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Alone in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2(10). 934–943.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact
Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Masaya Otsuka Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Suguru Nishigoori Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by John Mooney Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daigo Hiraya Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alessandro Mandurino‐Mirizzi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mathias Forkmann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Süleyman Çağan Efe Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Serena Rakar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Juan Lacalzada‐Almeida Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Venkatraman Srinivasan